Literature DB >> 12163638

Radiation dose distributions in normal tissue adjacent to tumors containing (131)I or (90)Y: the potential for toxicity.

Richard B Sparks1, Eric A Crowe, Franklin C Wong, Richard E Toohey, Jeffry A Siegel.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Given the relatively large tumor-absorbed doses reported for patients receiving radionuclide therapy, particularly radioimmunotherapy, and the relatively long pathlength of the nonpenetrating emissions of some radionuclides being used for these therapies, there exists the possibility of large absorbed doses to tissues adjacent to, surrounded by, or surrounding these tumors. Because tumors can occur adjacent to critical organs or tissues, such as arteries, nerves, pericardium, and the walls of the organs of the gastrointestinal tract, large absorbed doses to these normal tissues can lead to acute complications.
METHODS: In this study, the Monte Carlo radiation transport code MCNP4b was used to simulate the deposition of energy from emissions of 2 radionuclides of interest, (131)I and (90)Y, to assess the possible magnitude of the absorbed doses in tissues adjacent to tumors. Mathematic models were constructed to simulate situations that might occur, such as tumor wrapped around a small cylinder (e.g., a nerve or artery), tumor against a tissue (e.g., the pericardium or wall of any gastrointestinal tract organ), and tumor surrounded by any soft tissue. Tumor masses of 10, 20, and 40 g were used in each model. Depth dose distributions were calculated using Monte Carlo simulations of the radiation transport in these geometric models.
RESULTS: For tissues close to tumors containing (90)Y, the absorbed dose ranged from 24% of the absorbed dose in the tumor, for the case of tissues 1 mm from the tumor, to 103% of the absorbed dose in the tumor, for the case of small structures such as nerves or arteries surrounded by tumor. For tissues close to tumors containing (131)I, the absorbed dose ranged from 4% of the absorbed dose in the tumor, for the case of tissues 1 mm from the tumor, to 46% of the absorbed dose in the tumor, for the case of small structures such as nerves or arteries surrounded by tumor.
CONCLUSION: This study showed that when absorbed doses to tumors are large, the absorbed dose to adjacent tissues can also be large, potentially causing unexpected toxicities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12163638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  7 in total

1.  Radiofrequency ablation of lymphoma.

Authors:  Deepak Sudheendra; Mara M Barth; Upendra Hegde; Wyndham H Wilson; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Treatment with soluble bone morphogenetic protein type 1A receptor fusion protein alleviates irradiation-induced bone loss in mice through increased bone formation and reduced bone resorption.

Authors:  Shen Wang; Jie Li; Huabei Sun; Liangwei Sha; Yilong Guo; Guanqiu Gu; Jiling Mao; Xinfa Nie; Ying Zhai; Dehong Yu; Juan Zhai; Hongnian Li; Xin Shan; Chengbai Dai; Xiangzhi Wu; Xiaobo He; Li Xin; Jun Liu; Ke Heng; Qinghe Geng
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2020-03-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Single-Limb Irradiation Induces Local and Systemic Bone Loss in a Murine Model.

Authors:  Laura E Wright; Jeroen T Buijs; Hun-Soo Kim; Laura E Coats; Anne M Scheidler; Sutha K John; Yun She; Sreemala Murthy; Ning Ma; Helen J Chin-Sinex; Teresita M Bellido; Ted A Bateman; Marc S Mendonca; Khalid S Mohammad; Theresa A Guise
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Sclerostin antibody increases trabecular bone and bone mechanical properties by increasing osteoblast activity damaged by whole-body irradiation in mice.

Authors:  Samantha Costa; Heather Fairfield; Mariah Farrell; Connor S Murphy; Ashley Soucy; Calvin Vary; Gill Holdsworth; Michaela R Reagan
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.626

Review 5.  Therapeutic Irradiation: Consequences for Bone and Bone Marrow Adipose Tissue.

Authors:  Samantha Costa; Michaela R Reagan
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 5.555

6.  Influence of radiation exposure pattern on the bone injury and osteoclastogenesis in a rat model.

Authors:  Jianglong Zhai; Feilong He; Jianping Wang; Junxiang Chen; Ling Tong; Guoying Zhu
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 4.101

7.  Bone marrow stem cell dysfunction in radiation-induced abscopal bone loss.

Authors:  Qiong Zou; Wei Hong; Yi Zhou; Qiaoling Ding; Jinfeng Wang; Weifang Jin; Jianjun Gao; Guoqiang Hua; Xiaoya Xu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.359

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.