UNLABELLED: PET and (11)C-raclopride have been used to assess dopamine activity in vivo using a paradigm that involved d-amphetamine (AMPH)-induced endogenous dopamine release that led to reductions (relative to baseline) in the (11)C-raclopride-specific binding parameter (binding potential). A common assumption in bolus injection PET studies of this type is that cerebral blood flow (CBF) does not vary during the scan. The goal of this work was to examine the effect of AMPH administration on sequential PET measures of CBF. METHODS: Eight dynamic H(2)(15)O PET scans were acquired with arterial blood sampling in 6 baboons: 4 scans before AMPH (over 60 min) and 4 scans after AMPH (over 60 min) (0.6 mg/kg AMPH). Magnetic resonance images (coregistered to PET) were used to define regions of interest that included cortex, striatum (including subregions), and cerebellum. Data were analyzed using a 1-tissue compartment model. CBF was assessed through K(1) (mL/mL/min). RESULTS: Temporal patterns of the CBF alterations were similar across regions for each baboon. For 5 of 6 baboons, a general pattern of an initial increase in K(1) was observed after AMPH that gradually declined toward baseline, after minimizing anesthesia-induced variability in the in vivo measures. Although these alterations after AMPH were statistically significant in particular subcortical regions and cerebellum, such changes would not likely influence measures of (11)C-raclopride binding potential to a significant extent. CONCLUSION: These data support previous PET studies for which constant blood flow was assumed during the bolus PET (11)C-raclopride/AMPH experiment across striatal subregions, while underscoring the importance of considering effects of anesthesia when interpreting in vivo imaging parameters.
UNLABELLED: PET and (11)C-raclopride have been used to assess dopamine activity in vivo using a paradigm that involved d-amphetamine (AMPH)-induced endogenous dopamine release that led to reductions (relative to baseline) in the (11)C-raclopride-specific binding parameter (binding potential). A common assumption in bolus injection PET studies of this type is that cerebral blood flow (CBF) does not vary during the scan. The goal of this work was to examine the effect of AMPH administration on sequential PET measures of CBF. METHODS: Eight dynamic H(2)(15)O PET scans were acquired with arterial blood sampling in 6 baboons: 4 scans before AMPH (over 60 min) and 4 scans after AMPH (over 60 min) (0.6 mg/kg AMPH). Magnetic resonance images (coregistered to PET) were used to define regions of interest that included cortex, striatum (including subregions), and cerebellum. Data were analyzed using a 1-tissue compartment model. CBF was assessed through K(1) (mL/mL/min). RESULTS: Temporal patterns of the CBF alterations were similar across regions for each baboon. For 5 of 6 baboons, a general pattern of an initial increase in K(1) was observed after AMPH that gradually declined toward baseline, after minimizing anesthesia-induced variability in the in vivo measures. Although these alterations after AMPH were statistically significant in particular subcortical regions and cerebellum, such changes would not likely influence measures of (11)C-raclopride binding potential to a significant extent. CONCLUSION: These data support previous PET studies for which constant blood flow was assumed during the bolus PET (11)C-raclopride/AMPH experiment across striatal subregions, while underscoring the importance of considering effects of anesthesia when interpreting in vivo imaging parameters.
Authors: Mark Slifstein; Lawrence S Kegeles; Xiaoyan Xu; Judy L Thompson; Nina Urban; John Castrillon; Elizabeth Hackett; S-A Bae; Marc Laruelle; Anissa Abi-Dargham Journal: Synapse Date: 2010-05 Impact factor: 2.562
Authors: Yin J Chen; Bedda L Rosario; Wenzhu Mowrey; Charles M Laymon; Xueling Lu; Oscar L Lopez; William E Klunk; Brian J Lopresti; Chester A Mathis; Julie C Price Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2015-06-04 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Christin Y Sander; Joseph B Mandeville; Hsiao-Ying Wey; Ciprian Catana; Jacob M Hooker; Bruce R Rosen Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: J Richard Jennings; Matthew F Muldoon; Ellen M Whyte; Joelle Scanlon; Julie Price; Carolyn C Meltzer Journal: Hypertension Date: 2008-11-03 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Alicia F Heim; Melissa J Coyne; M Ilyas Kamboh; Christopher Ryan; J Richard Jennings Journal: Int J Psychophysiol Date: 2013-06-26 Impact factor: 2.997
Authors: J Richard Jennings; Matthew F Muldoon; Julie Price; Israel C Christie; Carolyn C Meltzer Journal: Hypertension Date: 2008-06-02 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Lidia Bellés; Andrea Dimiziani; Stergios Tsartsalis; Philippe Millet; François R Herrmann; Nathalie Ginovart Journal: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2021-03-17 Impact factor: 5.176