Literature DB >> 12163551

Functional inhibition in direction-selective retinal ganglion cells: spatiotemporal extent and intralaminar interactions.

Steven F Stasheff1, Richard H Masland.   

Abstract

We recorded from ON-OFF direction-selective ganglion cells (DS cells) in the rabbit retina to investigate in detail the inhibition that contributes to direction selectivity in these cells. Using paired stimuli moving sequentially across the cells' receptive fields in the preferred direction, we directly confirmed the prediction of that a wave of inhibition accompanies any moving excitatory stimulus on its null side, at a fixed spatial offset. Varying the interstimulus distance, stimulus size, luminance, and speed yielded a spatiotemporal map of the strength of inhibition within this region. This "null" inhibition was maximal at an intermediate distance behind a moving stimulus: 1/2 to 11/2 times the width of the receptive field. The strength of inhibition depended more on the distance behind the stimulus than on stimulus speed, and the inhibition often lasted 1-2 s. These spatial and temporal parameters appear to account for the known spatial frequency and velocity tuning of ON-OFF DS cells to drifting contrast gratings. Stimuli that elicit distinct ON and OFF responses to leading and trailing edges revealed that an excitatory response of either polarity could inhibit a subsequent response of either polarity. For example, an OFF response inhibited either an ON or OFF response of a subsequent stimulus. This inhibition apparently is conferred by a neural element or network spanning the ON and OFF sublayers of the inner plexiform layer, such as a multistratified amacrine cell. Trials using a stationary flashing spot as a probe demonstrated that the total amount of inhibition conferred on the DS cell was equivalent for stimuli moving in either the null or preferred direction. Apparently the cell does not act as a classic "integrate and fire" neuron, summing all inputs at the soma. Rather, computation of stimulus direction likely involves interactions between excitatory and inhibitory inputs in local regions of the dendrites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12163551     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2002.88.2.1026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  6 in total

1.  Flexible retinotopy: motion-dependent position coding in the visual cortex.

Authors:  David Whitney; Herbert C Goltz; Christopher G Thomas; Joseph S Gati; Ravi S Menon; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-09-18       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Inhibitory input to the direction-selective ganglion cell is saturated at low contrast.

Authors:  Mikhail Y Lipin; W Rowland Taylor; Robert G Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Mapping Synaptic Input Fields of Neurons with Super-Resolution Imaging.

Authors:  Yaron M Sigal; Colenso M Speer; Hazen P Babcock; Xiaowei Zhuang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Dendritic spikes amplify the synaptic signal to enhance detection of motion in a simulation of the direction-selective ganglion cell.

Authors:  Michael J Schachter; Nicholas Oesch; Robert G Smith; W Rowland Taylor
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Spike-triggered Clustering for Retinal Ganglion Cell Classification.

Authors:  Jungryul Ahn; Yongseok Yoo; Yong Sook Goo
Journal:  Exp Neurobiol       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 3.261

6.  Directionally selective retinal ganglion cells suppress luminance responses during natural viewing.

Authors:  Maesoon Im; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.