Literature DB >> 12163541

Spatial orientation of caloric nystagmus in semicircular canal-plugged monkeys.

Yasuko Arai1, Sergei B Yakushin, Bernard Cohen, Jun-Ichi Suzuki, Theodore Raphan.   

Abstract

We studied caloric nystagmus before and after plugging all six semicircular canals to determine whether velocity storage contributed to the spatial orientation of caloric nystagmus. Monkeys were stimulated unilaterally with cold ( approximately 20 degrees C) water while upright, supine, prone, right-side down, and left-side down. The decline in the slow phase velocity vector was determined over the last 37% of the nystagmus, at a time when the response was largely due to activation of velocity storage. Before plugging, yaw components varied with the convective flow of endolymph in the lateral canals in all head orientations. Plugging blocked endolymph flow, eliminating convection currents. Despite this, caloric nystagmus was readily elicited, but the horizontal component was always toward the stimulated (ipsilateral) side, regardless of head position relative to gravity. When upright, the slow phase velocity vector was close to the yaw and spatial vertical axes. Roll components became stronger in supine and prone positions, and vertical components were enhanced in side down positions. In each case, this brought the velocity vectors toward alignment with the spatial vertical. Consistent with principles governing the orientation of velocity storage, when the yaw component of the velocity vector was positive, the cross-coupled pitch or roll components brought the vector upward in space. Conversely, when yaw eye velocity vector was downward in the head coordinate frame, i.e., negative, pitch and roll were downward in space. The data could not be modeled simply by a reduction in activity in the ipsilateral vestibular nerve, which would direct the velocity vector along the roll direction. Since there is no cross coupling from roll to yaw, velocity storage alone could not rotate the vector to fit the data. We postulated, therefore, that cooling had caused contraction of the endolymph in the plugged canals. This contraction would deflect the cupula toward the plug, simulating ampullofugal flow of endolymph. Inhibition and excitation induced by such cupula deflection fit the data well in the upright position but not in lateral or prone/supine conditions. Data fits in these positions required the addition of a spatially orientated, velocity storage component. We conclude, therefore, that three factors produce cold caloric nystagmus after canal plugging: inhibition of activity in ampullary nerves, contraction of endolymph in the stimulated canals, and orientation of eye velocity to gravity through velocity storage. Although the response to convection currents dominates the normal response to caloric stimulation, velocity storage probably also contributes to the orientation of eye velocity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12163541     DOI: 10.1152/jn.2002.88.2.914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  5 in total

1.  The relation of motion sickness to the spatial-temporal properties of velocity storage.

Authors:  Mingjia Dai; Mikhail Kunin; Theodore Raphan; Bernard Cohen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of canal plugging on the vestibuloocular reflex and vestibular nerve discharge during passive and active head rotations.

Authors:  Soroush G Sadeghi; Jay M Goldberg; Lloyd B Minor; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The conjugacy of the vestibulo-ocular reflex evoked by single labyrinth stimulation in awake monkeys.

Authors:  Xuehui Tang; Youguo Xu; Ivra Simpson; Ben Jeffcoat; William Mustain; Wu Zhou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Unusual Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex Responses in Patients With Peripheral Vestibular Disorders Detected by the Caloric Step Stimulus Test.

Authors:  Motomu Honjo; Keiji Honda; Takeshi Tsutsumi
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  What does galvanic vestibular stimulation actually activate: response.

Authors:  Bernard Cohen; Sergei B Yakushin; Gay R Holstein
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 4.003

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.