Literature DB >> 12163309

How morphology predicts mechanical properties of trabecular structures depends on intra-specimen trabecular thickness variations.

G H van Lenthe1, R Huiskes.   

Abstract

Two observations underlie this work. First, that the architecture of trabecular bone can accurately predict the mechanical stiffness characteristics of bone specimens when considering the combination of volume fraction and fabric, which is a measure of architectural anisotropy. Second, that the same morphological measures could not accurately predict the mechanical properties of porous structures in general. We hypothesize that this discrepancy can be explained by the special nature of trabecular bone as a structure in remodeling equilibrium relative to the external loads. We tested this hypothesis using a generic model of trabecular bone. Five series of 153 different architectures were created with this model. Each architecture was subjected to morphological analysis, and four different fabric measures were calculated to evaluate their effectiveness in characterizing the architecture. Relationships were determined relating morphology to the elastic constants. The quality of these relationships was tested by correlating the predicted elastic constants with those determined from finite element analysis. We found that the four fabric measures used could estimate the mechanical properties almost equally well. So the suggestion that fabric measures based on trabecular bone volume better represent the architecture than mean intercept length could not be affirmed. We conclude that for structures with equally sized elliptical voids the mechanical properties can be predicted well only if trabecular thickness variations within each structure are limited. These structures closely resemble previously developed models of trabecular bone. Furthermore, they are stiff in the principal fabric direction, hence, according to Cowin (J. Biomech. Eng. (108) (1986) 83), they are in remodeling equilibrium. These structures are also stiff over a large range of loading orientations, hence, are relatively insensitive to deviations in direction of loading.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12163309     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(02)00081-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of trabecular bone anisotropies based on fractal dimensions and mean intercept length determined by principal axes of inertia.

Authors:  Won-Jin Yi; Min-Suk Heo; Sam-Sun Lee; Soon-Chul Choi; Kyung-Hoe Huh
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-02-24       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Finite element analysis of idealised unit cell cancellous structure based on morphological indices of cancellous bone.

Authors:  Mohammed Rafiq Abdul Kadir; Ardiyansyah Syahrom; Andreas Ochsner
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Mechanical and microarchitectural analyses of cancellous bone through experiment and computer simulation.

Authors:  Ardiyansyah Syahrom; Mohammed Rafiq Abdul Kadir; Jaafar Abdullah; Andreas Öchsner
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Variability of trabecular microstructure is age-, gender-, race- and anatomic site-dependent and affects stiffness and stress distribution properties of human vertebral cancellous bone.

Authors:  Yener N Yeni; Matthew J Zinno; Janardhan S Yerramshetty; Roger Zauel; David P Fyhrie
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Changes of elastic constants and anisotropy patterns in trabecular bone during disuse-induced bone loss assessed by poroelastic ultrasound.

Authors:  Luis Cardoso; Mitchell B Schaffler
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  Assessment of Regional Bone Density in Fractured Vertebrae Using Quantitative Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Hany A G Soliman; Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; Annie Levasseur; Stefan Parent; Yvan Petit
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-02-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.