OBJECTIVE: To compare functional outcome and quality of life after various treatments for squamous cell carcinoma of the base of the tongue. DESIGN: Retrospective survey using statistical comparison. SETTING: Academic medical center, institutional practice. PARTICIPANTS: Patients treated for squamous cell carcinoma of the base of the tongue between 1976 and 2000. Living patients 3 or more months after treatment were eligible. Questionnaire packets including validated site-specific quality-of-life instruments were mailed to 105 qualifying patients. Sixty-one patients participated, forming a volunteer sample. Patient responses were grouped according to treatment modality, operative vs nonoperative. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The planned outcome was that nonoperative therapy would result in better function than operative treatment. RESULTS: Most comparisons indicated no statistical difference in outcome between operative and nonoperative groups. Significant differences (95% confidence interval) were calculated for age, interval since treatment, and T stage. Group comparisons of patient responses revealed significant differences only in xerostomia and days hospitalized. CONCLUSIONS: The tongue remains dysfunctional after both surgical and nonoperative treatment. Nonoperative treatment might more adversely affect saliva. Surgery is associated with a longer hospital stay.
OBJECTIVE: To compare functional outcome and quality of life after various treatments for squamous cell carcinoma of the base of the tongue. DESIGN: Retrospective survey using statistical comparison. SETTING: Academic medical center, institutional practice. PARTICIPANTS: Patients treated for squamous cell carcinoma of the base of the tongue between 1976 and 2000. Living patients 3 or more months after treatment were eligible. Questionnaire packets including validated site-specific quality-of-life instruments were mailed to 105 qualifying patients. Sixty-one patients participated, forming a volunteer sample. Patient responses were grouped according to treatment modality, operative vs nonoperative. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The planned outcome was that nonoperative therapy would result in better function than operative treatment. RESULTS: Most comparisons indicated no statistical difference in outcome between operative and nonoperative groups. Significant differences (95% confidence interval) were calculated for age, interval since treatment, and T stage. Group comparisons of patient responses revealed significant differences only in xerostomia and days hospitalized. CONCLUSIONS: The tongue remains dysfunctional after both surgical and nonoperative treatment. Nonoperative treatment might more adversely affect saliva. Surgery is associated with a longer hospital stay.
Authors: Emily E Helman; J Robert Newman; Nichole R Dean; Wenyue Zhang; Kurt R Zinn; Eben L Rosenthal Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2010-07-15 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: S B Jensen; A M L Pedersen; A Vissink; E Andersen; C G Brown; A N Davies; J Dutilh; J S Fulton; L Jankovic; N N F Lopes; A L S Mello; L V Muniz; C A Murdoch-Kinch; R G Nair; J J Napeñas; A Nogueira-Rodrigues; D Saunders; B Stirling; I von Bültzingslöwen; D S Weikel; L S Elting; F K L Spijkervet; M T Brennan Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Susan Reisine; Douglas E Morse; Walter J Psoter; Ellen Eisenberg; Donald Cohen; Deborah Cleveland; Mirseyed Mohit-Tabatabai Journal: J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 1.895
Authors: Aline Lima da Silva Deboni; Adelmo José Giordani; Nilza Nelly Fontana Lopes; Rodrigo Souza Dias; Roberto Araujo Segreto; Siri Beier Jensen; Helena Regina Comodo Segreto Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2012-03-13 Impact factor: 3.603