Literature DB >> 12162668

Effects of bacterial direct-fed microbials on ruminal fermentation, blood variables, and the microbial populations of feedlot cattle.

G R Ghorbani1, D P Morgavi, K A Beauchemin, J A Z Leedle.   

Abstract

A study was conducted to determine whether bacterial direct-fed microbials (DFM) could be used to minimize the risk of acidosis in feedlot cattle receiving high concentrate diets. Six ruminally cannulated steers, previously adapted to a high concentrate diet, were used in a double 3 x 3 Latin square to study the effects of DFM on feed intake, ruminal pH, and ruminal and blood characteristics. Steers were provided ad libitum access to a diet containing steam-rolled barley, barley silage, and a protein-mineral supplement at 87, 9, and 4% (DM basis), respectively. Treatments were as follows: control, Propionibacterium P15 (P15), and Propionibacterium P15 and Enterococcus faecium EF212 (PE). The bacterial treatments (10(9) cfu/g) plus whey powder carrier, or whey powder alone for control, were top-dressed once daily at the time of feeding (10 g/[steer/d]). Periods consisted of 2 wk of adaptation and 1 wk of measurements. Ruminal pH was continuously measured for 6 d using indwelling electrodes. Dry matter intake and ruminal pH (mean, minimum, hours, and area pH < 5.8 or < 5.5) were not affected by treatment (P > 0.05). However, supplementation with P15 increased protozoal numbers (P < 0.05) with a concomitant increase in ruminal NH3 concentration (P < 0.01) and a decrease in the number of amylolytic bacteria (P < 0.05) compared with the control. Streptococcus bovis, enumerated using a selective medium, was numerically reduced with supplementation of PE. Although blood pH and blood glucose were not affected by DFM supplementation, steers fed PE had numerically lower concentrations of blood CO2 than control steers, which is consistent with a reduced risk of metabolic acidosis. Although the bacterial DFM used in this study did not induce changes in DMI or ruminal and blood pH, some rumen and blood variables indicated that the bacterial DFM used in this study may decrease the risk of acidosis in feedlot cattle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12162668     DOI: 10.2527/2002.8071977x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  19 in total

1.  Effects of Bacillus subtilis natto and Different Components in Culture on Rumen Fermentation and Rumen Functional Bacteria In Vitro.

Authors:  Peng Sun; Jinan Li; Dengpan Bu; Xuemei Nan; Hong Du
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Impact of subacute ruminal acidosis on the diversity of liquid and solid-associated bacteria in the rumen of goats.

Authors:  Wenjie Huo; Weiyun Zhu; Shengyong Mao
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Changes in bacterial diversity associated with epithelial tissue in the beef cow rumen during the transition to a high-grain diet.

Authors:  Yanhong Chen; Gregory B Penner; Meiju Li; Masahito Oba; Le Luo Guan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Whole genome sequence analyses-based assessment of virulence potential and antimicrobial susceptibilities and resistance of Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from commercial swine and cattle probiotic products.

Authors:  Pragathi B Shridhar; Raghavendra G Amachawadi; Mike Tokach; Isha Patel; Jayanthi Gangiredla; Mark Mammel; T G Nagaraja
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Effect of Clostridium butyricum Supplementation on in vitro Rumen Fermentation and Microbiota With High Grain Substrate Varying With Media pH Levels.

Authors:  Peixin Jiao; Ziwei Wang; Xin Wang; Yanan Zuo; Yuqing Yang; Guanghui Hu; Changming Lu; Xiaolai Xie; Li Wang; Wenzhu Yang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 6.064

6.  Rumen microbial and fermentation characteristics are affected differently by bacterial probiotic supplementation during induced lactic and subacute acidosis in sheep.

Authors:  Abderzak Lettat; Pierre Nozière; Mathieu Silberberg; Diego P Morgavi; Claudette Berger; Cécile Martin
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.605

Review 7.  Effect of Probiotics/Prebiotics on Cattle Health and Productivity.

Authors:  Yutaka Uyeno; Suguru Shigemori; Takeshi Shimosato
Journal:  Microbes Environ       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Comparative metabolite fingerprinting of the rumen system during colonisation of three forage grass (Lolium perenne L.) varieties.

Authors:  Alison H Kingston-Smith; Teri E Davies; Pauline Rees Stevens; Luis A J Mur
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Live Bacillus subtilis natto Promotes Rumen Fermentation by Modulating Rumen Microbiota In Vitro.

Authors:  Meinan Chang; Fengtao Ma; Jingya Wei; Junhao Liu; Xuemei Nan; Peng Sun
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  The diversity of the fecal bacterial community and its relationship with the concentration of volatile fatty acids in the feces during subacute rumen acidosis in dairy cows.

Authors:  Shengyong Mao; Ruiyang Zhang; Dongsheng Wang; Weiyun Zhu
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 2.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.