Literature DB >> 12161750

Biochemical networking contributes more to genetic buffering in human and mouse metabolic pathways than does gene duplication.

Toshimori Kitami1, Joseph H Nadeau.   

Abstract

During evolution different genes evolve at unequal rates, reflecting the varying functional constraints on phenotype. An important contributor to this variation is genetic buffering, which reduces the potential detrimental effects of mutations. We studied whether gene duplication and redundant metabolic networks affect genetic buffering by comparing the evolutionary rate of 242 human and mouse orthologous genes involved in metabolic pathways. A gene with a redundant network is defined as one for which the structural layout of metabolic pathways provides an alternative metabolic route that can, in principle, compensate for the loss of a protein function encoded by the gene. We found that genes with redundant networks evolve at similar rates as did genes without redundant networks, [corrected] but no significant difference was detected between single-copy genes and gene families. This implies that redundancy in metabolic networks provides significantly more genetic buffering than do gene families. We also found that genes encoding proteins involved in glycolysis and gluconeogenesis showed as a group a distinct pattern of variation, in contrast to genes involved in other pathways. These results suggest that redundant networks provide genetic buffering and contribute to the functional diversification of metabolic pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12161750     DOI: 10.1038/ng945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Genet        ISSN: 1061-4036            Impact factor:   38.330


  27 in total

1.  The metabolic world of Escherichia coli is not small.

Authors:  Masanori Arita
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Size of the protein-coding genome and rate of molecular evolution.

Authors:  Zoran A Rajic; Gradimir M Jankovic; Ana Vidovic; Natasa M Milic; Dejan Skoric; Milorad Pavlovic; Vladimir Lazarevic
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 3.172

3.  Standing genetic variation and compensatory evolution in transgenic organisms: a growth-enhanced salmon simulation.

Authors:  Robert N M Ahrens; Robert H Devlin
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 4.  Gene set enrichment analysis: performance evaluation and usage guidelines.

Authors:  Jui-Hung Hung; Tun-Hsiang Yang; Zhenjun Hu; Zhiping Weng; Charles DeLisi
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 11.622

5.  Identification of functional modules that correlate with phenotypic difference: the influence of network topology.

Authors:  Jui-Hung Hung; Troy W Whitfield; Tun-Hsiang Yang; Zhenjun Hu; Zhiping Weng; Charles DeLisi
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 13.583

6.  Evolution of dopamine-related systems: biosynthesis, degradation and receptors.

Authors:  Xianghui Ma; Zhiwen Wang; Xinbo Zhang
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Evolution of the acyl-CoA binding protein (ACBP).

Authors:  Mark Burton; Timothy M Rose; Nils J Faergeman; Jens Knudsen
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.857

8.  The degree of redundancy in metabolic genes is linked to mode of metabolism.

Authors:  R Mahadevan; D R Lovley
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Degeneracy: a link between evolvability, robustness and complexity in biological systems.

Authors:  James M Whitacre
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 2.432

10.  Mapping determinants of variation in energy metabolism, respiration and flight in Drosophila.

Authors:  Kristi L Montooth; James H Marden; Andrew G Clark
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.