Literature DB >> 12161734

Pediatric external auditory canal foreign bodies: a review of 698 cases.

Stacey L Schulze1, Joseph Kerschner, David Beste.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study goal was to determine the relationships between patient management factors and patient outcomes in pediatric patients with external auditory canal foreign bodies. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: Retrospective analysis was conducted of 698 consecutive cases of pediatric external auditory canal foreign bodies (n = 605 patients) who presented to a tertiary care pediatric referral center during a 6-year period.
RESULTS: Emergency physicians frequently removed foreign bodies under direct visualization while otolaryngologists primarily used otomicroscopy. Both of these methods had high success rates overall (77% and 86%), but attempts under direct visualization had lower success rates with removing spherical objects, objects touching the tympanic membrane, and objects in the canal for more than 24 hours. Failed removal attempts resulted in higher complication rates.
CONCLUSION: Certain foreign body and patient characteristics are associated with poor outcomes with removal attempts made under direct visualization. These cases should be referred directly to otolaryngologists for otomicroscopic removal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12161734     DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2002.126724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  14 in total

1.  Otitis media with effusion in children and its correlation with foreign body in the external auditory canal.

Authors:  Saurav Sarkar; M Sadhukhan; A Roychoudhury; B K Roychaudhuri
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-01-01

2.  Foreign bodies in ENT in a teaching hospital in Eastern India.

Authors:  Saurav Sarkar; A Roychoudhury; B K Roychaudhuri
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-09-24

3.  Satisfaction with an In-House Nasal Foreign Body Removal Manikin: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Pittayapon Pitathawatchai; Sittichoke Anuntaseree; Varah Yuenyongviwat
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2021-08-20

4.  Study on clinical presentation of ear and nose foreign bodies.

Authors:  Prayaga N Srinivas Moorthy; Madhira Srivalli; Goli V S Rau; Codadu Prasanth
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-02-09

5.  Aural foreign bodies in children.

Authors:  F E Ologe; A D Dunmade; O A Afolabi
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.967

6.  Foreign body in the Eustachian tube: case presentation and technique used for removal.

Authors:  Fernando de Andrade Quintanilha Ribeiro
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb

7.  Hydroscopic properties of organic objects that may present as aural foreign bodies.

Authors:  Julie C Brown; Sidrah Rizvi; Eileen J Klein; Rachel Bittner
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2010-08-18

8.  A child presenting with a bullet in the middle ear: case report.

Authors:  Patorn Piromchai; Somchai Srirompotong; Piyawadee Lertchanaruengrith; Robert Mills
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Case Rep       Date:  2012-01-05

9.  Actualities of management of aural, nasal, and throat foreign bodies.

Authors:  A C Oreh; D Folorunsho; T S Ibekwe
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

10.  Aural foreign body extraction in children: a double-edged sword.

Authors:  Oyebanji Olajuyin; Oladele Simeon Olatunya
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2015-02-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.