Literature DB >> 12161591

Prospective screening for subtelomeric rearrangements in children with mental retardation of unknown aetiology: the Amsterdam experience.

C D M van Karnebeek1, C Koevoets, S Sluijter, E K Bijlsma, D F M C Smeets, E J Redeker, R C M Hennekam, J M N Hoovers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The frequency of subtelomeric rearrangements in patients with unexplained mental retardation (MR) is uncertain, as most studies have been retrospective and case retrieval may have been biased towards cases more likely to have a chromosome anomaly. To ascertain the frequency of cytogenetic anomalies, including subtelomeric rearrangements, we prospectively screened a consecutive cohort of cases with unexplained MR in an academic tertiary centre.
METHODS: Inclusion criteria were: age <18 years at referral, IQ<85, no aetiological diagnosis after complete examination, which included karyotyping with high resolution banding (HRB).
RESULTS: In 266 karyotyped children, anomalies were detected in 20 (7.5%, seven numerical, 13 structural); 39 cases were analysed by FISH for specific interstitial microdeletions, and anomalies were found in nine (23%). FISH analyses for subtelomeric microdeletions were performed in 184 children (44% moderate-profound MR, 51% familial MR), and one rearrangement (0.5%) was identified in a non-familial MR female with mild MR (de novo deletion 12q24.33-qter). The number of probable polymorphisms was considerable: 2qter (n=7), Xpter (n=3), and Ypter (n=1). A significantly higher total number of malformations and minor anomalies was present in the cytogenetic anomaly group compared to the group without cytogenetic anomalies.
CONCLUSIONS: The total frequency of cytogenetic anomalies in this prospective study was high (1:10), but the frequency of subtelomeric rearrangements was low. The most likely explanations are the high quality of HRB cytogenetic studies and the lack of clinical selection bias. Conventional cytogenetic analyses, combined with targeted microdeletion testing, remain the single most effective way of additional investigation in mentally retarded children, also in a tertiary centre.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12161591      PMCID: PMC1735204          DOI: 10.1136/jmg.39.8.546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  38 in total

1.  GOMBO syndrome: another "pseudorecessive" disorder due to a cryptic translocation.

Authors:  A Verloes; S Lesenfants; M Jamar; V Dideberg; C Herens
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2000-11-13

2.  Screening chromosome ends for learning disability.

Authors:  S J Knight; J Flint
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-11-18

3.  High resolution comparative genomic hybridisation analysis reveals imbalances in dyschromosomal patients with normal or apparently balanced conventional karyotypes.

Authors:  M Kirchhoff; H Rose; J Maahr; T Gerdes; M Bugge; N Tommerup; Z Tümer; J Lespinasse; P K Jensen; J Wirth; C Lundsteen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  CONGENITAL ANOMALIES IN THE NEWBORN INFANT, INCLUDING MINOR VARIATIONS. A STUDY OF 4,412 BABIES BY SURFACE EXAMINATION FOR ANOMALIES AND BUCCAL SMEAR FOR SEX CHROMATIN.

Authors:  P M MARDEN; D W SMITH; M J MCDONALD
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 4.406

5.  Clinical studies on submicroscopic subtelomeric rearrangements: a checklist.

Authors:  B B de Vries; S M White; S J Knight; R Regan; T Homfray; I D Young; M Super; C McKeown; M Splitt; O W Quarrell; A H Trainer; M F Niermeijer; S Malcolm; J Flint; J A Hurst; R M Winter
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  Subtle chromosomal rearrangements in children with unexplained mental retardation.

Authors:  S J Knight; R Regan; A Nicod; S W Horsley; L Kearney; T Homfray; R M Winter; P Bolton; J Flint
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-11-13       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Detection of chromosomal aberrations by a whole-genome microsatellite screen.

Authors:  M J Rosenberg; D Vaske; C E Killoran; Y Ning; D Wargowski; L Hudgins; C J Tifft; J Meck; J K Blancato; K Rosenbaum; R M Pauli; J Weber; L G Biesecker
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 8.  Perfect endings: a review of subtelomeric probes and their use in clinical diagnosis.

Authors:  S J Knight; J Flint
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.318

9.  An optimized set of human telomere clones for studying telomere integrity and architecture.

Authors:  S J Knight; C M Lese; K S Precht; J Kuc; Y Ning; S Lucas; R Regan; M Brenan; A Nicod; N M Lawrie; D L Cardy; H Nguyen; T J Hudson; H C Riethman; D H Ledbetter; J Flint
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-06-22       Impact factor: 11.043

10.  The promise and pitfalls of telomere region-specific probes.

Authors:  B C Ballif; C D Kashork; L G Shaffer
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 11.043

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Learning difficulties: what the neurologist needs to know.

Authors:  C D Rittey
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 2.  Telomeres: a diagnosis at the end of the chromosomes.

Authors:  B B A De Vries; R Winter; A Schinzel; C van Ravenswaaij-Arts
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 3.  Chromosome analysis: what and when to request.

Authors:  F H Sharkey; E Maher; D R FitzPatrick
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  "Familial" versus "sporadic" intellectual disability: contribution of subtelomeric rearrangements.

Authors:  Maryam Rafati; Mohammad R Ghadirzadeh; Yaser Heshmati; Homeira Adibi; Zarrintaj Keihanidoust; Mohammad R Eshraghian; Jila Dastan; Azadeh Hoseini; Marzieh Purhoseini; Saeed R Ghaffari
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Subtelomeric rearrangements in idiopathic mental retardation.

Authors:  Gopalrao V N Velagaleti; Sally S Robinson; Bobby M Rouse; Vijay S Tonk; Lillian H Lockhart
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.967

6.  Value for money? Array genomic hybridization for diagnostic testing for genetic causes of intellectual disability.

Authors:  Dean A Regier; Jan M Friedman; Carlo A Marra
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  To determine the frequency of subtelomeric abnormalities in children with idiopathic mental retardation.

Authors:  K S Rana; R G Holla
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-10-22

8.  Phenotypic variant of Brachydactyly-mental retardation syndrome in a family with an inherited interstitial 2q37.3 microdeletion including HDAC4.

Authors:  Pablo Villavicencio-Lorini; Eva Klopocki; Marc Trimborn; Randi Koll; Stefan Mundlos; Denise Horn
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Identification of subtelomeric genomic imbalances and breakpoint mapping with quantitative PCR in 296 individuals with congenital defects and/or mental retardation.

Authors:  Bernd Auber; Verena Bruemmer; Barbara Zoll; Peter Burfeind; Detlef Boehm; Thomas Liehr; Knut Brockmann; Ekkehard Wilichowski; Loukas Argyriou; Iris Bartels
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Absence of subtelomeric rearrangements in selected patients with mental retardation as assessed by multiprobe T FISH.

Authors:  Suely Rodrigues dos Santos; Dértia Villalba Freire-Maia
Journal:  J Negat Results Biomed       Date:  2012-12-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.