Literature DB >> 12160920

Attributes of clinical recommendations that influence change in practice following audit and feedback.

Robbie Foy1, Graeme MacLennan, Jeremy Grimshaw, Gillian Penney, Marion Campbell, Richard Grol.   

Abstract

The object of this study was to determine which attributes of clinical practice recommendations influence changes in clinical practice following audit and feedback. This was an observational study using multilevel modeling to examine the relationship between attributes of clinical practice recommendations and compliance with the recommendations before and after audit and feedback. Sixteen hospital gynecology units in Scotland participated in a national audit project. Clinical practice recommendations covering selected gynecological topics were developed and data collected to assess baseline (preintervention) compliance. Summaries of performance were fed back to consultant gynecologists in each hospital and follow-up (postintervention) data were collected. Trained audit assistants used standardized forms to abstract data from case notes. Compliance data were available at baseline and follow-up for a total of 42 clinical practice recommendations. Altogether, 4,664 case notes contributed to baseline data and 4,382 to follow-up data. Thirteen attributes describing clinical practice recommendations were developed, based upon previous work, and pretested. A panel of seven consultant gynecologists rated the extent to which each of the 42 recommendations possessed each of the 13 attributes. The main outcome measures were the association of each attribute with compliance and with changes in clinical practice. Recommendations compatible with clinician values and not requiring changes to fixed routines were independently associated with greater compliance at baseline and follow-up. However, recommendations incompatible with clinician values were independently associated with greater change in practice following audit and feedback. Attributes of recommendations may influence the effectiveness of audit and feedback in secondary care. Recommendations seen as incompatible with clinician values are associated with lower compliance but greater behavioral change following audit and feedback.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12160920     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(02)00403-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  52 in total

1.  Characteristics of effective clinical guidelines for general practice.

Authors:  Jako S Burgers; Richard P T M Grol; Joost O M Zaat; Teun H Spies; Akke K van der Bij; Henk G A Mokkink
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  A prospective cluster-randomized trial to implement the Canadian CT Head Rule in emergency departments.

Authors:  Ian G Stiell; Catherine M Clement; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Robert J Brison; Brian H Rowe; Jacques S Lee; Amit Shah; Jamie Brehaut; Brian R Holroyd; Michael J Schull; R Douglas McKnight; Mary A Eisenhauer; Jonathan Dreyer; Eric Letovsky; Tim Rutledge; Iain Macphail; Scott Ross; Jeffrey J Perry; Urbain Ip; Howard Lesiuk; Carol Bennett; George A Wells
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Glenn Robert; Fraser Macfarlane; Paul Bate; Olivia Kyriakidou
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Lessons learned in implementing evidence-based practices: implications for psychiatric administrators.

Authors:  Richard M Bloch; Sy Atezaz Saeed; Jeanne C Rivard; Christina Rausch
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2006

Review 5.  Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives.

Authors:  Richard P T M Grol; Marije C Bosch; Marlies E J L Hulscher; Martin P Eccles; Michel Wensing
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.911

6.  Future directions of evidence-based practice in athletic training: perceived strategies to enhance the use of evidence-based practice.

Authors:  Cailee E Welch; Dorice A Hankemeier; Aimee L Wyant; Danica G Hays; William A Pitney; Bonnie L Van Lunen
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 7.  Printed educational materials: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.

Authors:  Anik Giguère; France Légaré; Jeremy Grimshaw; Stéphane Turcotte; Michelle Fiander; Agnes Grudniewicz; Sun Makosso-Kallyth; Fredric M Wolf; Anna P Farmer; Marie-Pierre Gagnon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-10-17

8.  Optimizing the language and format of guidelines to improve guideline uptake.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; Navjot Rai; Onil Bhattacharrya; Alice Y Y Cheng; Kim A Connelly; Louis-Philippe Boulet; Alan Kaplan; Melissa C Brouwers; Monika Kastner
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Clinical practice guidelines: towards better quality guidelines and increased international collaboration.

Authors:  R Grol; F A Cluzeau; J S Burgers
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Follow-up care for men with prostate cancer and the role of primary care: a systematic review of international guidelines.

Authors:  H M McIntosh; R D Neal; P Rose; E Watson; C Wilkinson; D Weller; C Campbell
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.