Literature DB >> 12160578

Repeat prostate biopsy: who, how and when?. a review.

Bob Djavan1, Mesut Remzi, Claude C Schulman, Michael Marberger, Alexandre R Zlotta.   

Abstract

Urologists are frequently faced with the dilemma of treating a patient with a high index of suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa), but an initial set of negative biopsies. In this review, we evaluated the current knowledge on repeat prostate biopsies, focusing on when to perform them and in which patients, how many samples to take, where to direct the biopsies and what morbidity should be expected. We focussed on the available literature and the multicenter European Prostate Cancer Detection (EPCD) study. The EPCD study included 1051 men with a total PSA from 4 to 10 ng/ml who underwent a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided sextant biopsy and a repeat biopsy in case of a negative initial biopsy. Most studies support that increasing the number of biopsy cores as compared to the sextant technique and improving prostate peripheral zone (PZ) sampling result in a significant improvement in the detection of prostate cancer without increase in morbidity or effects on quality of life. Re-biopsy can be performed 6 weeks later with no significant difference in pain or morbidity. At least 10% of patients with negative sextant prostatic biopsy results in the EPCD study were diagnosed with PCa on repeat biopsy, percent free PSA and PSA density of the transition zone being the most accurate predictors. Despite differences in location (more apico-dorsal) and multifocality, pathological and biochemical features of cancers detected on initial and repeat biopsy were similar, suggesting similar biological behavior and thus advocating for a repeat prostate biopsy in case of a negative finding on initial biopsy. Indications and ideal number of biopsy cores to take when repeating biopsies in patients who already underwent extensive biopsy protocols on the first biopsy remains to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12160578     DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(02)00256-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  22 in total

Review 1.  The emerging threat of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in urology.

Authors:  Hosam M Zowawi; Patrick N A Harris; Matthew J Roberts; Paul A Tambyah; Mark A Schembri; M Diletta Pezzani; Deborah A Williamson; David L Paterson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  Strategies for repeat prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Martha K Terris
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  Contemporary issues in the diagnosis of prostate cancer for the radiologist.

Authors:  Richard Clements
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Advancements in magnetic resonance-guided robotic interventions in the prostate.

Authors:  Katarzyna J Macura; Dan Stoianovici
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-12

Review 5.  Biomarkers in prostate cancer surveillance and screening: past, present, and future.

Authors:  K Clint Cary; Mathew R Cooperberg
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2013-12

6.  A review of repeat prostate biopsies and the influence of technique on cancer detection: our experience.

Authors:  M R Quinlan; R G Casey; R Flynn; R Grainger; T E D McDermott; J A Thornhill
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 7.  [Serum markers for early detection and staging of prostate cancer. Status report on current and future markers].

Authors:  A Haese; M Graefen; J Palisaar; E Huland; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 8.  [Transrectal ultrasound-guided punch biopsies of the prostate. Indication, technique, results, and complications].

Authors:  J Palisaar; T Eggert; M Graefen; A Haese; H Huland
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Detection rate of prostate cancer on the basis of the vienna nomogram: a singapore study.

Authors:  Jin Kiat Teo; Beow Kiong Poh; Foo Cheong Ng; Yan Kit Fong
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2014-04-10

10.  Diagnosis of relevant prostate cancer using supplementary cores from magnetic resonance imaging-prompted areas following multiple failed biopsies.

Authors:  Daniel N Costa; B Nicolas Bloch; David F Yao; Martin G Sanda; Long Ngo; Elizabeth M Genega; Ivan Pedrosa; William C DeWolf; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 2.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.