| Literature DB >> 12157868 |
Abstract
"A common perception among producers (and users) of population projections is that complex and/or sophisticated techniques produce more accurate forecasts than simple and/or naive techniques. In this paper we test the validity of that perception by evaluating the forecast accuracy and bias of eight commonly used projection techniques drawn from...four categories [trend extrapolation, ratio extrapolation, cohort-component, and structural]. Using data for [U.S.] state population projections from a number of different time periods, we find no evidence that complex and/or sophisticated techniques produce more accurate or less biased forecasts than simple, naive techniques." excerptKeywords: Americas; Bias; Comparative Studies; Critique; Developed Countries; Error Sources; Estimation Technics; Measurement; Methodological Studies; North America; Northern America; Population Forecast; Population Projection; Research Methodology; Studies; United States
Mesh:
Year: 1992 PMID: 12157868 DOI: 10.1016/0169-2070(92)90060-m
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Forecast ISSN: 0169-2070