Literature DB >> 12155377

Measuring migration distances: self-reporting and indirect methods.

L Long, C J Tucker, W L Urton.   

Abstract

Methods of determining distance covered in migration are discussed. "Two approaches for doing so are simply to ask movers how far they moved or to infer distance from localities of origin and destination. The former has been used in Health Interview Surveys, and the latter is applied to Current Population Surveys; both are national surveys conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau. The two approaches appear to produce consistent results and offer ways of increasing comparability of data and research findings on geographical mobility." excerpt

Keywords:  Americas; Comparative Studies; Data Collection; Data Sources; Demographic Factors; Destination; Developed Countries; Developing Countries; Distance; Estimation Technics; Evaluation; Geographic Factors; Indirect Estimation Technics; Measurement; Migration; North America; Northern America; Origin; Population; Population Dynamics; Reliability; Research Methodology; Sampling Studies; Studies; Survey Methodology; Surveys; United States

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 12155377     DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1988.10478647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  2 in total

1.  Migration distances: an international comparison.

Authors:  L Long; C J Tucker; W L Urton
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1988-11

2.  Implications of boundary choice for the measurement of residential mobility.

Authors:  M J White; P R Mueser
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1988-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.