Literature DB >> 12154206

Analysis of improvements, full responses, remission and toxicity in rheumatoid patients treated with step-up combination therapy (methotrexate, cyclosporin A, sulphasalazine) or monotherapy for three years.

G F Ferraccioli1, E Gremese, P Tomietto, G Favret, R Damato, E Di Poi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate two monotherapies followed by step-up combination therapy with two or three complementary drugs in active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in comparison with sulphasalazine (SSZ) alone.
METHODS: One hundred and twenty-six consecutive patients with early active RA were enrolled in this open controlled clinical trial. The primary end-point was 50% improvement according to the ACR criteria (ACR50) at 6, 12 or 18 months. The secondary end-points were a full response (Magnusson criteria) and/or remission (ACR criteria) at 3 yr. Methotrexate (MTX) (group 1), cyclosporin A (CsA) (group 2) or SSZ (group 3) was used first. After 6 months, a combination of two drugs (CsA and MTX) was employed in groups 1 and 2. SSZ was added after 12 months if improvement was less than ACR50 with the combination. Group 3 continued with SSZ alone.
RESULTS: After 6 months, 57% of patients in group 1, 31% of group 2 (MTX vs CsA, P=0.002) and 33% of group 3 (MTX vs SSZ, P=0.01) had reached ACR50 improvement according to intention-to-treat analysis. At month 12 after starting a drug combination, 67% of group 1 and 76% of group 2 had reached ACR50 compared with 24% of group 3. At the 18-month follow-up, 90% of group 1 and 88% of group 2 but only 24% of group 3 had reached ACR50. After 18 months, 62% of group 1, 60% of group 2 and 48% of group 3 showed side-effects and three, five and eight patients in the three groups respectively had dropped out of the study. At the 3-yr follow-up, 9% of the patients in groups 1 and 2 and 7% of group 3 were in remission according to the ACR criteria; according to the Magnusson criteria, 40% showed a full response in groups 1 and 2 but only 21% did so in group 3.
CONCLUSION: MTX appears to be the fastest-acting agent. A step-up approach with MTX plus CsA plus SSZ led to a 50% improvement according to the ACR criteria in most patients. After 3 yr, 40% of patients receiving combination therapy and 21% of patients receiving monotherapy showed a full response, while 9 and 7% respectively attained remission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12154206     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/41.8.892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  13 in total

Review 1.  Sulfasalazine: a review of its use in the management of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Greg L Plosker; Katherine F Croom
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Cost-effectiveness of adding magnetic resonance imaging to rheumatoid arthritis management.

Authors:  Lisa G Suter; Liana Fraenkel; R Scott Braithwaite
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-04-11

Review 3.  Combination treatment strategies in early rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  E Suresh; C M Lambert
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-04-28       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  Comparative effectiveness of treatment options after conventional DMARDs failure in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Yoon-Kyoung Sung; Soo-Kyung Cho; Dam Kim; Chan-Bum Choi; Soyoung Won; So-Young Bang; Hoon-Suk Cha; Jung-Yoon Choe; Won Tae Chung; Seung-Jae Hong; Jae-Bum Jun; Hyoun Ah Kim; Jinseok Kim; Seong-Kyu Kim; Tae-Hwan Kim; Hye-Soon Lee; Jaejoon Lee; Jisoo Lee; Shin-Seok Lee; Sung Won Lee; Yeon-Ah Lee; Seong-Su Nah; Chang-Hee Suh; Dae-Hyun Yoo; Bo Young Yoon; Sang Cheol Bae
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 5.  Methotrexate monotherapy and methotrexate combination therapy with traditional and biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis: A network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Glen S Hazlewood; Cheryl Barnabe; George Tomlinson; Deborah Marshall; Daniel J A Devoe; Claire Bombardier
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-08-29

Review 6.  Aspects of early arthritis. Definition of disease states in early arthritis: remission versus minimal disease activity.

Authors:  Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil; Ferdinand C Breedveld; Tom W J Huizinga
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.156

7.  Biomarkers of good EULAR response to the B cell depletion therapy in all seropositive rheumatoid arthritis patients: clues for the pathogenesis.

Authors:  Gianfranco Ferraccioli; Barbara Tolusso; Francesca Bobbio-Pallavicini; Elisa Gremese; Viviana Ravagnani; Maurizio Benucci; Edoardo Podestà; Fabiola Atzeni; Alice Mannocci; Domenico Biasi; Mariangela Manfredi; Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini; Bruno Laganà; Carlomaurizio Montecucco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Old drugs, old problems: where do we stand in prediction of rheumatoid arthritis responsiveness to methotrexate and other synthetic DMARDs?

Authors:  Vasco Crispim Romão; Helena Canhão; João Eurico Fonseca
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 9.  The Use of Cyclosporine A in Rheumatology: a 2016 Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Cecilia Beatrice Chighizola; Voon H Ong; Pier Luigi Meroni
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 10.817

Review 10.  Treatment comparison in rheumatoid arthritis: head-to-head trials and innovative study designs.

Authors:  Ennio Giulio Favalli; Serena Bugatti; Martina Biggioggero; Roberto Caporali
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.