Literature DB >> 12153957

Mandibular advancement devices: rate of contraindications in 100 consecutive obstructive sleep apnea patients.

Francois-Xavier Petit1, Jean-Louis Pépin, Georges Bettega, Hazem Sadek, Bernard Raphaël, Patrick Lévy.   

Abstract

Mandibular advancement devices (MAD) should be contraindicated (Clark GT, Sleep Med Rev 1998;2:163-174) if there are: (1) insufficient teeth to support the device, (2) periodontal problems inducing tooth mobility, (3) active temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorder, and (4) limited maximum protrusive distance (< 6 mm). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the proportion of the obstructive sleep apnea population that exhibits any contraindication (CI) to MAD. For this study there were 100 unselected adult patients consecutively diagnosed by polysomnography in a tertiary sleep laboratory. Clinical and radiologic evaluation of the dental, periodontal, and TMJ status of these 100 patients were performed by two expert maxillofacial surgeons, blind to each other, permitting the identification of MAD CIs. The two maxillofacial surgeons agreed on MAD absolute CIs in 96 of the 100 patients. CIs were identified in 34% of the patients. The nature of the CIs systematically referred to an insufficient number of remaining teeth (mean number of teeth lost: 7.8 +/- 6.1 with 31 patients having had more than 10 teeth removed). The tooth avulsions were significantly higher in contraindicated compared with noncontraindicated patients (16 +/- 8 versus 4 +/- 3, p < 0.00001). Periodontal abnormalities coexisted with dental CI in approximately half of the patients. A TMJ disorder was considered as significant enough to lead to CI in two patients. Dental and periodontal care was needed in 16 patients before the use of MAD could be considered. Conclusions were that primary CIs were present in 34% of 100 consecutive patients, mainly owing to dental problems. Moreover, another subgroup of patients (16%) required close supervision and follow-up to avoid impairment of preexisting TMJ and dental problems. Such a high rate of CI should be considered when the overall efficacy of oral appliances is compared with other treatments, such as surgery or nasal continuous positive airway pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12153957     DOI: 10.1164/rccm.2008167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


  29 in total

Review 1.  The undervalued potential of positional therapy in position-dependent snoring and obstructive sleep apnea-a review of the literature.

Authors:  M J L Ravesloot; J P van Maanen; L Dun; N de Vries
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 2.  Management of obstructive sleep apnea in edentulous patients: an overview of the literature.

Authors:  David S P Heidsieck; Maurits H T de Ruiter; Jan de Lange
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 2.816

3.  Theoretical approach towards increasing effectiveness of palatal surgery in obstructive sleep apnea: role for concomitant positional therapy?

Authors:  J P van Maanen; B I Witte; N de Vries
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 2.816

4.  Treatment of elderly patients with snoring and obstructive sleep apnea using a mandibular advancement device.

Authors:  Marie Marklund; Karl A Franklin
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 2.816

5.  Mandibular exercises improve mandibular advancement device therapy for obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Paulo Afonso Cunali; Fernanda R Almeida; Camila D Santos; Natália Y Valdrichi; Liliane S Nascimento; Cibele Dal-Fabbro; Sérgio Tufik; Lia Rita A Bittencourt
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 2.816

6.  Negative association between self-reported jaw symptoms and apnea-hypopnea index in patients with symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a pilot study.

Authors:  Takafumi Kato; Akira Mikami; Hideko Sugita; Hisae Muraki; Mutsumi Okura; Motoharu Ohi; Mitsutaka Taniguchi
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.816

7.  Orthoimplants: an alternative treatment for SAHS?

Authors:  Felix de Carlos; Juan Cobo; Maria Pilar Fernandez Mondragon; Alberto Alvarez Suarez; Juan Calvo Blanco
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 2.816

8.  The sleep position trainer: a new treatment for positional obstructive sleep apnoea.

Authors:  J Peter van Maanen; Kristel A W Meester; Lideke N Dun; Ioannis Koutsourelakis; Birgit I Witte; D Martin Laman; Antonius A J Hilgevoord; Nico de Vries
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 2.816

9.  Systematic assessment of the impact of oral appliance therapy on the temporomandibular joint during treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: long-term evaluation.

Authors:  Lílian C Giannasi; Fernanda R Almeida; Márcio Magini; Maricília S Costa; Cláudia S de Oliveira; Júlio César Mendes de Oliveira; Sandra Kalil Bussadori; Luis Vicente F de Oliveira
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 10.  Updates in oral appliance therapy for snoring and obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors:  Hui Chen; Alan A Lowe
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2012-05-06       Impact factor: 2.816

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.