Literature DB >> 12153804

Effects of preoperative and postoperative epiretinal membranes on macular hole closure and visual restoration.

Lingyun Cheng1, Stanley P Azen, Mohamed H El-Bradey, Mitsuko Toyoguchi, Sunan Chaidhawangul, Maria E Rivero, Barbara M Scholz, William R Freeman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of epiretinal membranes (ERMs) on macular hole surgical results and postoperative visual restoration.
DESIGN: A subgroup analysis arising from a multicenter, controlled, randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-one phakic eyes with an idiopathic macular hole that underwent standard vitrectomy for macular hole repair with or without ERM peeling.
METHODS: Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data of macular status, ERM status, and visual function status were recorded, and their relationships were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Visual acuity and clinical features of macular hole and ERM on baseline examination and scheduled follow-ups.
RESULTS: ERM peeling was associated with greater anatomic hole closure success rates (67% of the ERM peeled vs. 35% of nonpeeled, P = 0.03) but not associated with visual improvement in eyes with anatomic hole closure (2.9 lines improvement vs. 3.6 lines improvement, P > 0.5). Macular hole reopening was associated with excessive ERM growth (P = 0.005). Postoperative ERMs were more common in the eyes that underwent cataract surgery after vitrectomy (77% in aphakic and 36% in phakic eyes, P = 0.02). Macular hole edge approximation or hole appearance after initial vitrectomy for hole repair was stable over the average 18-month period in 89% of the eyes; only approximately 10% of the eyes underwent changes in their hole appearance. The hole edge approximation or hole appearance was associated with preoperative hole size and postoperative visual acuity. Preoperative hole size was found to be the major predictor of postoperative visual acuity (P < 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Surgical ERM peeling increases the anatomic hole closure rate. The presence of postoperative ERMs was not associated with postoperative visual acuity; however, excessive ERM growth contributed to hole reopening. Preoperative hole size was the most sensitive predictor for postoperative visual acuity. Surgical intervention during the early stages of macular hole before ERM formation is strongly recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12153804     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01093-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  10 in total

1.  [Anatomical and functional results after elective macular surgery].

Authors:  A Hager; S Ehrich; W Wiegand
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  Literature Review of Surgical Treatment in Idiopathic Full-Thickness Macular Hole.

Authors:  Mantapond Ittarat; Thanapong Somkijrungroj; Sunee Chansangpetch; Pear Pongsachareonnont
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-30

3.  Correlation between foveal structure and visual outcome following macular hole surgery: a spectral optical coherence tomography study.

Authors:  Zofia Michalewska; Janusz Michalewski; Slawomir Cisiecki; Ron Adelman; Jerzy Nawrocki
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Central photoreceptor viability and prediction of visual outcome in patients with idiopathic macular holes.

Authors:  Song Ee Chung; Dong Hui Lim; Se Woong Kang; Young Hee Yoon; Ju Byung Chae; In Ho Roh
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-08-03

Review 5.  A review of current management of vitreomacular traction and macular hole.

Authors:  Alfredo García-Layana; José García-Arumí; José M Ruiz-Moreno; Lluís Arias-Barquet; Francisco Cabrera-López; Marta S Figueroa
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  FIRST FAILED MACULAR HOLE SURGERY OR REOPENING OF A PREVIOUSLY CLOSED HOLE: Do We Gain by Reoperating?-A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gerard A Reid; Niamh McDonagh; David M Wright; John T O Yek; Rohan W Essex; Noemi Lois
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.975

7.  Revision Surgery for Idiopathic Macular Hole after Failed Primary Vitrectomy.

Authors:  Alexandre Lachance; Eunice You; Jérôme Garneau; Serge Bourgault; Mathieu Caissie; Éric Tourville; Ali Dirani
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 8.  Update on surgical management of complex macular holes: a review.

Authors:  Mohd-Asyraaf Abdul-Kadir; Lik Thai Lim
Journal:  Int J Retina Vitreous       Date:  2021-12-20

9.  Simultaneous development of full-thickness macular hole and neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Shuichiro Aoki; Hiroko Imaizumi
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2022-01-22

10.  Clinical characteristics, risk factors, and surgical outcomes of secondary macular hole after vitrectomy.

Authors:  Hyun Goo Kang; Jae Yong Han; Eun Young Choi; Suk Ho Byeon; Sung Soo Kim; Hyoung Jun Koh; Sung Chul Lee; Min Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.