Literature DB >> 12152502

Feasibility of mobile cancer screening and prevention.

Ann S O'Malley1, William Lawrence, Wenchi Liang, Robin Yabroff, Jean Lynn, Jon Kerner, Jeanne Mandelblatt.   

Abstract

Many areas have high cancer mortality rates and medically underserved populations. This study describes the feasibility (acceptability and costs) of an urban multiphasic (multiple cancers) screening van. Feasibility was evaluated by literature review and informant interviews. Costs were estimated by resource use from urban mobile screening units; decision analysis estimated the costs per cancer detected for breast, cervix, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening. Acceptability of a multiphasic van varied by the informant's perspective. Feasibility and costs were most sensitive to four parameters: age, prior screening history, risk factors, and volume of simultaneous examinations. Subsidized mobile screening facilities may have the potential to reduce cancer morbidity and mortality if they target hard-to-reach underscreened groups, maintain high volume, coordinate with primary care providers, and build on an infrastructure that provides diagnostic and treatment services regardless of ability to pay. It is unclear whether the investment required will translate into a reasonable cost per year of life saved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12152502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved        ISSN: 1049-2089


  4 in total

1.  A randomized comparative effectiveness trial of novel endoscopic techniques and approaches for Barrett's esophagus screening in the community.

Authors:  Sarmed S Sami; Kelly T Dunagan; Michele L Johnson; Cathy D Schleck; Nilay D Shah; Alan R Zinsmeister; Louis-Michel Wongkeesong; Kenneth K Wang; David A Katzka; Krish Ragunath; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Cost of services provided by the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.

Authors:  Donatus U Ekwueme; Sujha Subramanian; Justin G Trogdon; Jacqueline W Miller; Janet E Royalty; Chunyu Li; Gery P Guy; Wesley Crouse; Hope Thompson; James G Gardner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Continuous Rural-Urban Coding for Cancer Disparity Studies: Is It Appropriate for Statistical Analysis?

Authors:  Lusine Yaghjyan; Christopher R Cogle; Guangran Deng; Jue Yang; Pauline Jackson; Nancy Hardt; Jaclyn Hall; Liang Mao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Cost analysis of screening for, diagnosing, and staging prostate cancer based on a systematic review of published studies.

Authors:  Donatus U Ekwueme; Leonardo A Stroud; Yanjing Chen
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 2.830

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.