Literature DB >> 12152361

What does the implicit association test measure? A test of the convergent and discriminant validity of prejudice-related IATs.

Bertram Gawronski1.   

Abstract

Drawing on recent criticism of the Implicit Association Test (IAT), the present study tested the convergent and discriminant validity of two prejudice-related IATs to corresponding explicit prejudice measures in a German student sample (N = 61). Confirming convergent validity, (a) an IAT designed to assess negative associations related to Turkish people was significantly related to the explicit endorsement of prejudiced beliefs about Turkish people, and (b) an IAT designed to assess negative associations related to East Asians was significantly related to explicit prejudice against East Asians. Moreover, confirming discriminant validity, (c) the Asian IAT was unrelated to the explicit endorsement of prejudiced beliefs about Turkish people, and (d) the Turkish IAT was unrelated to explicit prejudice against Asian people. These results further corroborate the assumption that the IAT is a valid method to assess the strength of evaluative associations in the domain of prejudice and stereotypes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12152361     DOI: 10.1026//1618-3169.49.3.171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1618-3169


  15 in total

1.  Awareness of implicit attitudes.

Authors:  Adam Hahn; Charles M Judd; Holen K Hirsh; Irene V Blair
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2013-12-02

2.  When best intentions aren't enough: helping medical students develop strategies for managing bias about patients.

Authors:  Cayla R Teal; Rachel E Shada; Anne C Gill; Britta M Thompson; Ernest Frugé; Graciela B Villarreal; Paul Haidet
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  A service learning based project to change implicit and explicit bias toward obese individuals in kinesiology pre-professionals.

Authors:  Paul B Rukavina; Weidong Li; Bo Shen; Haichun Sun
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 3.942

4.  Using Community Data to Test the Discriminate Validity of Ethnic/Racial Group IATs.

Authors:  Irene V Blair; Charles M Judd; Edward P Havranek; John F Steiner
Journal:  Z Psychol       Date:  2010-01-01

5.  The Effects of Oncologist Implicit Racial Bias in Racially Discordant Oncology Interactions.

Authors:  Louis A Penner; John F Dovidio; Richard Gonzalez; Terrance L Albrecht; Robert Chapman; Tanina Foster; Felicity W K Harper; Nao Hagiwara; Lauren M Hamel; Anthony F Shields; Shirish Gadgeel; Michael S Simon; Jennifer J Griggs; Susan Eggly
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Racialized Perceptions and Child Neglect.

Authors:  Sheila D Ards; Samuel L Myers; Patricia Ray; Hyeon-Eui Kim; Kevin Monroe; Irma Arteaga
Journal:  Child Youth Serv Rev       Date:  2012-08-01

7.  Persistence of the uncanny valley: the influence of repeated interactions and a robot's attitude on its perception.

Authors:  Jakub A Złotowski; Hidenobu Sumioka; Shuichi Nishio; Dylan F Glas; Christoph Bartneck; Hiroshi Ishiguro
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-30

8.  The Reliability of Child-Friendly Race-Attitude Implicit Association Tests.

Authors:  Amanda Williams; Jennifer R Steele
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-10-24

9.  The role of implicit affective responses and trait self-control in ego resource management.

Authors:  Jacek Buczny; Rebekah L Layton; Mark Muraven
Journal:  Motiv Emot       Date:  2015

10.  Using behavior-analytic implicit tests to assess sexual interests among normal and sex-offender populations.

Authors:  Bryan Roche; Anthony O'Reilly; Amanda Gavin; Maria R Ruiz; Gabriela Arancibia
Journal:  Socioaffect Neurosci Psychol       Date:  2012-03-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.