Literature DB >> 12151934

Intrathecal ropivacaine in rabbits: pharmacodynamic and neurotoxicologic study.

Jean-Marc Malinovsky1, Florence Charles, Marielle Baudrimont, Yann Péréon, Pascal Le Corre, Michel Pinaud, Dan Benhamou.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ropivacaine is available for spinal or intrathecal use in humans, although data on neurotoxicity after spinal injection are not yet available. The authors experimentally determined the relationship between doses of intrathecal ropivacaine and spinal effects and local neurotoxic effects.
METHODS: Eighty rabbits equipped with an intrathecal lumbar catheter were studied. Sixty were randomly assigned to receive 0.2 ml of intrathecal solutions as a sole injection of: 0.2%, 0.75%, 1.0%, and 2.0% ropivacaine (doses from 0.4-4.0 mg; groups R0.2 to R2.0), 5.0% lidocaine (10 mg; group L), or 0.9% NaCl as control (group C). Twenty other rabbits received either repeated injections of 0.2 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine every 2 days during 2 weeks (total dose of 2.8 mg; group RINT); or a continuous intrathecal infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at the rate of 1.8 ml/h over 45 min (2.7 mg; group RCONT). Injection rate was 30 s in all groups except Rcont. Time to onset, duration and extent of motor block, and variations of mean arterial blood pressure were recorded in all groups. Somatosensory evoked potentials were also recorded in group RCONT and RINT. Seven days after the last intrathecal injection spinal cord and nerves were sampled for histopathologic study.
RESULTS: In groups R0.2 and RINT, the lowest dose of ropivacaine induced a clinically visible spinal block in only 50% of rabbits, but SEPs recorded in group RINT were decreased by 70% in the lumbar dermatome. Complete motor block was observed with doses greater than 1.5 mg of ropivacaine (group RCONT and R0.75 to R2.0). Onset time was shorter and duration of block increased as doses of ropivacaine increased. Significant hypotension was observed only with 4.0 mg of ropivacaine (concentration of 2.0%). Complete paralysis and hypotension were observed with 5.0% lidocaine. No neurologic clinical lesion was observed in rabbits receiving saline or ropivacaine within the 7 days after the last intrathecal injection, and histopathologic study revealed no sign of neurotoxicity in these groups. In contrast, intrathecal lidocaine induced clinical and histopathologic changes.
CONCLUSION: Ropivacaine induced dose-dependent spinal anesthesia, and did not induce any neurotoxicologic lesion in this experimental animal model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12151934     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200208000-00021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  6 in total

Review 1.  Intrathecal therapy for chronic pain: current trends and future needs.

Authors:  Salim M Hayek; Michael C Hanes
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-01

2.  An ultrasound-guided technique for axillary brachial plexus nerve block in rabbits.

Authors:  Carla Fonseca; Anna Server; Marielle Esteves; David Barastegui; Marta Rosal; Cesar G Fontecha; Francisco Soldado
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 12.625

3.  The effects of adding various doses of clonidine to ropivacaine in spinal anesthesia.

Authors:  Gonul Sagiroglu; Tamer Sagiroglu; Burhan Meydan
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2009-12

4.  Toxicology Evaluation of Drugs Administered via Uncommon Routes: Intranasal, Intraocular, Intrathecal/Intraspinal, and Intra-Articular.

Authors:  Armaghan Emami; Jeff Tepper; Brian Short; Tony L Yaksh; Alison M Bendele; Thulasi Ramani; Alvaro F Cisternas; Jay H Chang; R Daniel Mellon
Journal:  Int J Toxicol       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.032

Review 5.  Benefit-risk assessment of ropivacaine in the management of postoperative pain.

Authors:  Wolfgang Zink; Bernhard M Graf
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Bupivacaine in alginate and chitosan nanoparticles: an in vivo evaluation of efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and local toxicity.

Authors:  Cíntia Maria Saia Cereda; Daniel Sebbe Mecatti; Juliana Zampoli Boava Papini; Diego Valério Bueno; Michelle Franz-Montan; Thalita Rocha; José Pedrazzoli Júnior; Eneida de Paula; Daniele Ribeiro de Araújo; Renato Grillo; Leonardo Fernandes Fraceto; Silvana Aparecida Calafatti; Giovana Radomille Tofoli
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.133

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.