BACKGROUND: The potential increase in the number of liver grafts gained from systematically using the technique of splitting optimal organs is still unknown. This study investigates the proportion of donors that should be considered for in situ split-liver harvesting according to strict criteria on which a consensus could be reached easily. METHODS: The records of 407 consecutive donors during a 4-year period in Switzerland were analyzed. Non-heart-beating donors and donors with missing data were excluded, leaving 338 donors as the study population. Liver splitting was considered feasible when the following criteria were met: age> or =14 and < or =50 years; weight> or =45 kg; body mass index< or =26 kg/m2; intensive care stay< or =3 days; mean arterial pressure> or =60 mm Hg; Na< or =160 mmol/L; serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase< or =60 U/L; gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase< or =50 U/L; no steatosis at ultrasonography. Organs from donors> or =70 kg were considered suitable for a split, producing organs for two adults. RESULTS: Fifty-two (15%) donors fulfilled all the conditions for a split-liver procedure, of whom 29 (8.6%) were donors for 2 adults. The number of donors suitable for splitting increased to 145 (43%) if donors with only one missing criterion were included (77 [23%] for 2 adults). CONCLUSION: Even if the technique is restricted to optimal donors, splitting could appreciably increase the number of liver grafts. A wider use of the technique could reduce the patient's time on the waiting list and the need for living-donor procedures, and should be encouraged.
BACKGROUND: The potential increase in the number of liver grafts gained from systematically using the technique of splitting optimal organs is still unknown. This study investigates the proportion of donors that should be considered for in situ split-liver harvesting according to strict criteria on which a consensus could be reached easily. METHODS: The records of 407 consecutive donors during a 4-year period in Switzerland were analyzed. Non-heart-beating donors and donors with missing data were excluded, leaving 338 donors as the study population. Liver splitting was considered feasible when the following criteria were met: age> or =14 and < or =50 years; weight> or =45 kg; body mass index< or =26 kg/m2; intensive care stay< or =3 days; mean arterial pressure> or =60 mm Hg; Na< or =160 mmol/L; serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase< or =60 U/L; gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase< or =50 U/L; no steatosis at ultrasonography. Organs from donors> or =70 kg were considered suitable for a split, producing organs for two adults. RESULTS: Fifty-two (15%) donors fulfilled all the conditions for a split-liver procedure, of whom 29 (8.6%) were donors for 2 adults. The number of donors suitable for splitting increased to 145 (43%) if donors with only one missing criterion were included (77 [23%] for 2 adults). CONCLUSION: Even if the technique is restricted to optimal donors, splitting could appreciably increase the number of liver grafts. A wider use of the technique could reduce the patient's time on the waiting list and the need for living-donor procedures, and should be encouraged.
Authors: Andrea Lauterio; Stefano Di Sandro; Giacomo Concone; Riccardo De Carlis; Alessandro Giacomoni; Luciano De Carlis Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-10-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Dieter C Broering; Christian Wilms; Christian Lenk; Jan Schulte am Esch; Silke Schönherr; Lars Mueller; Jong-Sun Kim; Knut Helmke; Martin Burdelski; Xavier Rogiers Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Matteo Cescon; Marco Spada; Michele Colledan; Giuliano Torre; Enzo Andorno; Umberto Valente; Giorgio Rossi; Paolo Reggiani; Umberto Cillo; Umberto Baccarani; Gian Luca Grazi; Giuseppe Tisone; Franco Filipponi; Massimo Rossi; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre; Mauro Salizzoni; Oreste Cuomo; Tullia De Feo; Bruno Gridelli Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Daniel Azoulay; Cyrille Feray; Chetana Lim; Chady Salloum; Maria Conticchio; Daniel Cherqui; Antonio Sa Cunha; René Adam; Eric Vibert; Didier Samuel; Marc Antoine Allard; Nicolas Golse Journal: JHEP Rep Date: 2022-02-12