Literature DB >> 12151044

Object preference and nicotine consumption in rats with high vs. low rearing activity in a novel open field.

Cornelius R Pawlak1, Rainer K W Schwarting.   

Abstract

Our previous work has shown that normal male wistar rats can differ systematically with respect to rearing activity in a novel open field: animals with high rearing activity (HRA rats) differed from those with low rearing activity (LRA rats) in dopaminergic and cholinergic brain activity, as well as in their behavioral responsiveness to a cholinergic antagonist, but not in measures of anxiety in the elevated plus-maze. Here, we tested (a) whether HRA vs. LRA reflects responsiveness to novelty, (b) whether such rats voluntarily consume different amounts of the cholinergic agonist nicotine and (c) whether these measures are related to those of anxiety in the plus-maze. Using a novel object test, we found that HRA showed a trend for more object exploration than LRA rats when confronted with two identical novel objects in a familiar open field. When subsequently confronted with a familiar vs. a new object, HRA rats showed substantially more exploration of the new but not of the familiar object than LRA rats. In a subsequent test, HRA vs. LRA rats did not differ in voluntary or forced consumption of oral nicotine, or water. In contrast to rearing activity in a novel open field, measures of anxiety in the plus-maze were neither related to behavior in the novel object test nor to voluntary oral consumption of nicotine, or water. Among others, these data are discussed with respect to dopaminergic and cholinergic forebrain mechanisms, which have previously been found to differ between HRA and LRA rats. Since forebrain dopamine and acetylcholine functions are critical for novelty processing, we suggest that they are also important for the differential behavioral patterns of HRA and LRA rats in the open field, and in the novel object test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12151044     DOI: 10.1016/s0091-3057(02)00852-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  12 in total

1.  A phenotype-driven ENU mutagenesis screen for the identification of dominant mutations involved in alcohol consumption.

Authors:  Cornelius R Pawlak; Carles Sanchis-Segura; Dian Soewarto; Sibylle Wagner; Martin Hrabé de Angelis; Rainer Spanagel
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 2.957

2.  Repeated nicotine treatment in rats with high versus low rearing activity: analyses of behavioural sensitisation and place preference.

Authors:  Cornelius R Pawlak; Rainer K W Schwarting
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-11-17       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Individual differences in oral nicotine intake in rats.

Authors:  Tanseli Nesil; Lutfiye Kanit; Allan C Collins; Sakire Pogun
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 5.250

4.  Impulsivity is associated with uric acid: evidence from humans and mice.

Authors:  Angelina R Sutin; Roy G Cutler; Simonetta Camandola; Manuela Uda; Neil H Feldman; Francesco Cucca; Alan B Zonderman; Mark P Mattson; Luigi Ferrucci; David Schlessinger; Antonio Terracciano
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 5.  Individual differences in the behavioral effects of nicotine: A review of the preclinical animal literature.

Authors:  Adriana M Falco; Rick A Bevins
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 3.533

6.  Oral Nicotine Self-Administration in Rodents.

Authors:  Allan C Collins; Sakire Pogun; Tanseli Nesil; Lutfiye Kanit
Journal:  J Addict Res Ther       Date:  2012-06-01

7.  Adolescent toluene inhalation in rats affects white matter maturation with the potential for recovery following abstinence.

Authors:  Jhodie Rubina Duncan; Alec Lindsay Ward Dick; Gary Egan; Scott Kolbe; Maria Gavrilescu; David Wright; Dan Ian Lubman; Andrew John Lawrence
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A novel elevated plus-maze procedure to avoid the one-trial tolerance problem.

Authors:  Peggy Schneider; Ying-Jui Ho; Rainer Spanagel; Cornelius Rainer Pawlak
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  A robust and reliable non-invasive test for stress responsivity in mice.

Authors:  Annemarie Zimprich; Lillian Garrett; Jan M Deussing; Carsten T Wotjak; Helmut Fuchs; Valerie Gailus-Durner; Martin Hrabě de Angelis; Wolfgang Wurst; Sabine M Hölter
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.558

Review 10.  Cognitive Dysfunction, Affective States, and Vulnerability to Nicotine Addiction: A Multifactorial Perspective.

Authors:  Morgane Besson; Benoît Forget
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.