Literature DB >> 12150674

The Model State Emergency Health Powers Act: planning for and response to bioterrorism and naturally occurring infectious diseases.

Lawrence O Gostin1, Jason W Sapsin, Stephen P Teret, Scott Burris, Julie Samia Mair, James G Hodge, Jon S Vernick.   

Abstract

The Center for Law and the Public's Health at Georgetown and Johns Hopkins Universities drafted the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (MSEHPA or Model Act) at the request of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Model Act provides state actors with the powers they need to detect and contain bioterrorism or a naturally occurring disease outbreak. Legislative bills based on the MSEHPA have been introduced in 34 states. Problems of obsolescence, inconsistency, and inadequacy may render current state laws ineffective or even counterproductive. State laws often date back to the early 20th century and have been built up in layers over the years. They frequently predate the vast changes in the public health sciences and constitutional law. The Model Act is structured to reflect 5 basic public health functions to be facilitated by law: (1) preparedness, comprehensive planning for a public health emergency; (2) surveillance, measures to detect and track public health emergencies; (3) management of property, ensuring adequate availability of vaccines, pharmaceuticals, and hospitals, as well as providing power to abate hazards to the public's health; (4) protection of persons, powers to compel vaccination, testing, treatment, isolation, and quarantine when clearly necessary; and (5) communication, providing clear and authoritative information to the public. The Model Act also contains a modernized, extensive set of principles and requirements to safeguard personal rights. Law can be a tool to improve public health preparedness. A constitutional democracy must balance the common good with respect for personal dignity, toleration of groups, and adherence to principles of justice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health; Legal Approach; War and Human Rights Abuses

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12150674     DOI: 10.1001/jama.288.5.622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  33 in total

1.  The politics of emergency health powers and the isolation of public health.

Authors:  John M Colmers; Daniel M Fox
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Legal and public policy responses of states to bioterrorism.

Authors:  William Martin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Ethical challenges in preparing for bioterrorism: barriers within the health care system.

Authors:  Matthew K Wynia; Lawrence O Gostin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Manifold restraints: liberty, public health, and the legacy of Jacobson v Massachusetts.

Authors:  James Colgrove; Ronald Bayer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Public health strategy and the police powers of the state.

Authors:  Jorge E Galva; Christopher Atchison; Samuel Levey
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 6.  Autonomy, paternalism, and justice: ethical priorities in public health.

Authors:  David R Buchanan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Contrasting experiences of state public health law reform pursuant to the Turning Point Model State Public Health Act.

Authors:  Benjamin Mason Meier; Kristine M Gebbie; James G Hodge
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

8.  State health policy for terrorism preparedness.

Authors:  Leah Z Ziskin; Drew A Harris
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  The law and emergencies: surveillance for public health-related legal issues during Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.

Authors:  Rachel I Weiss; Karen L McKie; Richard A Goodman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Oral vaccination of mice with adenoviral vectors is not impaired by preexisting immunity to the vaccine carrier.

Authors:  Z Q Xiang; G P Gao; A Reyes-Sandoval; Y Li; J M Wilson; H C J Ertl
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.