Literature DB >> 12150599

Estimating utility values for health states of type 2 diabetic patients using the EQ-5D (UKPDS 62).

Philip Clarke1, Alastair Gray, Rury Holman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze quality-of-life data from the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) to estimate the impact of diabetes-related complications on utility-based measures of quality of life.
METHODS: The EuroQol EQ-5D instrument was administered in 1996 to 3667 UKPDS patients with type 2 diabetes. Tobit and censored least absolute deviations (CLAD) regression analysis based on data from the 3192 respondents was used to estimate the impact of major complications on (1) the visual analog scale (VAS) and (2) the EQ-5D utilities derived from population-based time trade-off values.
RESULTS: Using the tobit model, the effect on tariff values was as follows: myocardial infarction = -0.055 (95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.067, -0.042), blindness in 1 eye = -0.074 (95% CI= -0.124, -0.052), ischemic heart disease = -0.090 (95% CI = -0.126, -0.054), heartfailure = -0.108 (95% CI= -0.169, -0.048), stroke = -0.164 (95% CI = -0.222, -0.105), and amputation = -0.280 (95% CI = -0.389, -0.170). The impact on the VAS scores was smaller, but the ranking was identical. Estimates of these effects, based on the nonparametric CLAD estimator, are also reported and compared.
CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate the magnitude of the impact of 6 complications on utility-based measures of quality of life, which can be used to estimate the outcome of interventions that reduce these diabetes-related complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12150599     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0202200412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  169 in total

1.  Costs and benefits of free medications after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Irfan A Dhalla; Monique A Smith; Niteesh K Choudhry; Avram E Denburg
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2009-11

Review 2.  Conducting Economic Evaluations Alongside Randomised Trials: Current Methodological Issues and Novel Approaches.

Authors:  Dyfrig Hughes; Joanna Charles; Dalia Dawoud; Rhiannon Tudor Edwards; Emily Holmes; Carys Jones; Paul Parham; Catrin Plumpton; Colin Ridyard; Huw Lloyd-Williams; Eifiona Wood; Seow Tien Yeo
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Regression estimators for generic health-related quality of life and quality-adjusted life years.

Authors:  Anirban Basu; Andrea Manca
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Health-related quality of life deficits associated with diabetes and comorbidities in a Canadian National Population Health Survey.

Authors:  Sheri L Maddigan; David H Feeny; Jeffrey A Johnson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Mapping the EQ-5D index from the SF-12: US general population preferences in a nationally representative sample.

Authors:  Patrick W Sullivan; Vahram Ghushchyan
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  The impact of 29 chronic conditions on health-related quality of life: a general population survey in Finland using 15D and EQ-5D.

Authors:  Samuli I Saarni; Tommi Härkänen; Harri Sintonen; Jaana Suvisaari; Seppo Koskinen; Arpo Aromaa; Jouko Lönnqvist
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Economic evaluation of hormonal therapies for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer in Canada.

Authors:  S Djalalov; J Beca; E Amir; M Krahn; M E Trudeau; J S Hoch
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  A lifetime modelled economic evaluation comparing pioglitazone and rosiglitazone for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the UK.

Authors:  Philip Home; Adrian Bagust; Matthew Taylor; Philip Ambery; Samara Mendes da Costa
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Variation in treatment preferences and care goals among older patients with diabetes and their physicians.

Authors:  Marshall H Chin; Melinda L Drum; Lei Jin; Morgan E Shook; Elbert S Huang; David O Meltzer
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Preferences of patients with diabetes mellitus for inhaled versus injectable insulin regimens.

Authors:  Jeremy Chancellor; Samuel Aballéa; Alison Lawrence; Rob Sheldon; Sandrine Cure; Juliette Plun-Favreau; Nick Marchant
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.