Literature DB >> 12150598

Primary prevention drug therapy: can it meet patients' requirements for reduced risk?

Hilary A Llewellyn-Thomas1, J Michael Paterson, Judy A Carter, Antoni Basinsk, Martin G Myers, Gordon D Hardacre, Earl V Dunn, Ralph B D'Agostino, Philip A Wolf, C David Naylor.   

Abstract

The objective was to identify, in primary prevention, patients whose "required risk reduction" (ReqRR) is greater than the "achievable risk reduction" (ARR) that cholesterol-lowering or antihypertensive medication could provide. Individualized estimates of 10-year coronary heart disease or stroke risk were derived for 66 hypercholesterolemic (HC) and 64 hypertensive (HT) patients without symptomatic cardiovascular disease. These estimates were used in trade-off tasks identifying each individual's ReqRR. Then individual ARRs were estimated (in HC patients by assuming total cholesterol/high density lipoprotein ratio reductions to 5.0; in HT patients by assuming systolic blood pressure reductions to 120 mmHg). 12 (18%) HC and 12 (19%) HT subjects would refuse medication regardless of the risk reduction offered. Of the remaining patients, 15/54 (28%; 95% C.I.:16-40%) HC and 19/52 (37%; 95% C.I: 24-51%) HT subjects were "over-requirers," in that their ReqRR/ARR ratio was 1.5. There maybe a notable proportion of patients whose ReqRR is considerably greater than what is achievable, implying that decision aids may help individuals clarify preferences about accepting/refusing medication for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12150598     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0202200411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  12 in total

Review 1.  Preventive Treatments for Rheumatoid Arthritis: Issues Regarding Patient Preferences.

Authors:  Axel Finckh; Monica Escher; Matthew H Liang; Nick Bansback
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Relationship between universal health outcome priorities and willingness to take medication for primary prevention of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Siobhan M Case; John O'Leary; Nancy Kim; Mary E Tinetti; Terri R Fried
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Effects of benefits and harms on older persons' willingness to take medication for primary cardiovascular prevention.

Authors:  Terri R Fried; Mary E Tinetti; Virginia Towle; John R O'Leary; Lynne Iannone
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-02-28

4.  Primary care clinicians' experiences with treatment decision making for older persons with multiple conditions.

Authors:  Terri R Fried; Mary E Tinetti; Lynne Iannone
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-09-13

5.  A proposal for an additional clinical trial outcome measure assessing preventive effect as delay of events.

Authors:  Per Lytsy; Lars Berglund; Johan Sundström
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Characterizing the public's preferential attitudes toward end-of-life care options: a role for the threshold technique?

Authors:  R Trafford Crump; H Llewellyn-Thomas
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Preference assessment of recruitment into a randomized trial for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Lori A Dolan; Vani Sabesan; Stuart L Weinstein; Kevin F Spratt
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  How to ask: older adults' preferred tools in health outcome prioritization.

Authors:  Siobhan M Case; Terri R Fried; John O'Leary
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-12-04

9.  Rating the preferences for potential harms of treatments for cardiovascular disease: a survey of community-dwelling adults.

Authors:  Guangxiang Zhang; Puja B Parikh; Soraya Zabihi; David L Brown
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 2.583

10.  Views of older persons with multiple morbidities on competing outcomes and clinical decision-making.

Authors:  Terri R Fried; Sarah McGraw; Joseph V Agostini; Mary E Tinetti
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 5.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.