SETTING: Patients with sputum smear-positive, newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis studied at Tygerburg Hospital, Cape Town, for their early response to streptomycin (SM). OBJECTIVE: To determine the standard early bactericidal activity (EBA), namely the fall in viable counts of tubercle bacilli in 16-hour sputum collections during the first 2 days of treatment with SM. DESIGN: Patients were randomised to logarithmically spaced daily doses of 7.5, 15 or 30 mg/kg SM. A comparison by standard biological assay methods was then made with previous estimations of the EBA of paromomycin in doses of 7.5 and 15 mg/kg. RESULTS: An EBA of 0.133 obtained with 30 mg/kg SM differed significantly from zero (P = 0.0009), while the EBAs of 0.043 with 15 mg/kg and -0.025 with 7.5 mg/kg did not so differ. A linear regression equation of EBA = -0.2587 + 0.2627 log10 dose was obtained with significant slope (P = 0.007). Paromomycin was estimated to be 1.745 more potent than SM with wide 95% confidence limits (0.6-28.6), indicating that it cannot be considered more potent than SM. CONCLUSIONS: The low EBAs show that SM has low, dose-related, bactericidal activity in cavities, consistent with results from clinical trials. If streptomycin-resistant bacilli are present, paromomycin is probably the aminoglycoside of choice.
RCT Entities:
SETTING:Patients with sputum smear-positive, newly diagnosed pulmonary tuberculosis studied at Tygerburg Hospital, Cape Town, for their early response to streptomycin (SM). OBJECTIVE: To determine the standard early bactericidal activity (EBA), namely the fall in viable counts of tubercle bacilli in 16-hour sputum collections during the first 2 days of treatment with SM. DESIGN:Patients were randomised to logarithmically spaced daily doses of 7.5, 15 or 30 mg/kg SM. A comparison by standard biological assay methods was then made with previous estimations of the EBA of paromomycin in doses of 7.5 and 15 mg/kg. RESULTS: An EBA of 0.133 obtained with 30 mg/kg SM differed significantly from zero (P = 0.0009), while the EBAs of 0.043 with 15 mg/kg and -0.025 with 7.5 mg/kg did not so differ. A linear regression equation of EBA = -0.2587 + 0.2627 log10 dose was obtained with significant slope (P = 0.007). Paromomycin was estimated to be 1.745 more potent than SM with wide 95% confidence limits (0.6-28.6), indicating that it cannot be considered more potent than SM. CONCLUSIONS: The low EBAs show that SM has low, dose-related, bactericidal activity in cavities, consistent with results from clinical trials. If streptomycin-resistant bacilli are present, paromomycin is probably the aminoglycoside of choice.
Authors: Veronique De Jager; Lize van der Merwe; Amour Venter; Peter R Donald; Andreas H Diacon Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-03-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Zahoor Ahmad; Michael L Pinn; Eric L Nuermberger; Charles A Peloquin; Jacques H Grosset; Petros C Karakousis Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2010-08-06 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Henrik Cordes; Christoph Thiel; Hélène E Aschmann; Vanessa Baier; Lars M Blank; Lars Kuepfer Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2016-09-23 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: P R Donald; D P Parkin; H I Seifart; H S Schaaf; P D van Helden; C J Werely; F A Sirgel; A Venter; J S Maritz Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2007-05-16 Impact factor: 3.064