Literature DB >> 12149756

Redrawing organ distribution boundaries: results of a computer-simulated analysis for liver transplantation.

Richard B Freeman1, Ann M Harper, Erick B Edwards.   

Abstract

For several years, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Liver and Intestinal Transplantation Committee has been examining effects of changes and proposed changes to the liver allocation system. The Institute of Medicine recently recommended that the size of liver distribution units be increased to improve the organ distribution system. Methods to achieve this and the potential impact on patients and transplant centers of such a change are evaluated in this study. In hypothetical scenarios, we combined geographically contiguous organ procurement organizations (OPOs) in seven different configurations to increase the size of liver distribution units to cover populations greater than 9 million persons. Using the UNOS Liver Allocation Model (ULAM), we examined the effect of 17 different organ allocation sequences in these proposed realignments and compared them with those predicted by ULAM for the current liver distribution system by using the following primary outcome variables: number of primary liver transplantations performed, total number of deaths, and total number of life-years saved. Every proposed new liver distribution unit plan resulted in fewer primary transplantations. Many policies increased the total number of deaths and reduced total life-years saved compared with the current system. Most of the proposed plans reduced interregional variation compared with the current plan, but no one plan consistently reduced variation for all outcome variables, and all reductions in variations were relatively small. All new liver distribution unit plans led to significant shifts in the number of transplantations performed in individual OPOs compared with the current system. The ULAM predicts that changing liver distribution units to larger geographic areas has little positive impact on overall results of liver transplantation in the United States compared with the current plan. Enlarging liver distribution units likely will result in significant shifts in organs across current OPO boundaries, which will have a significant impact on the activity of many transplant centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12149756     DOI: 10.1053/jlts.2002.34385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  4 in total

1.  D-MELD risk capping improves post-transplant and overall mortality under markov microsimulation.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Halldorson; Robert L Carithers; Renuka Bhattacharya; Ramasamy Bakthavatsalam; Iris W Liou; Andre A Dick; Jorge D Reyes; James D Perkins
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2014-09-24

Review 2.  Development of the allocation system for deceased donor liver transplantation.

Authors:  John M Coombes; James F Trotter
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2005-05

3.  Access to pediatric liver transplantation: does regional variation play a role?

Authors:  Mary T Austin; Irene D Feurer; C Wright Pinson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Current Issues in Liver Transplantation.

Authors:  James F Trotter
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2016-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.