BACKGROUND: With the decrease in junior doctor hours, the advent of specialist registrars, and the availability of highly trained and experienced nursing personnel, the service needs of patients with chronic respiratory diseases attending routine outpatient clinics may be better provided by appropriately trained nurse practitioners. METHODS: A randomised controlled crossover trial was used to compare nurse practitioner led care with doctor led care in a bronchiectasis outpatient clinic. Eighty patients were recruited and randomised to receive 1 year of nurse led care and 1 year of doctor led care in random order. Patients were followed up for 2 years to ensure patient safety and acceptability and to assess differences in lung function. Outcome measures were forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), 12 minute walk test, health related quality of life, and resource use. RESULTS: The mean difference in FEV(1) was 0.2% predicted (95% confidence interval -1.6 to 2.0%, p=0.83). There were no significant differences in the other clinical or health related quality of life measures. Nurse led care resulted in significantly increased resource use compared with doctor led care (mean difference pound 1497, 95% confidence interval pound 688 to pound 2674, p<0.001), a large part of which resulted from the number and duration of hospital admissions. The mean difference in resource use was greater in the first year ( pound 2625) than in the second year ( pound 411). CONCLUSIONS: Nurse practitioner led care for stable patients within a chronic chest clinic is safe and is as effective as doctor led care, but may use more resources.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: With the decrease in junior doctor hours, the advent of specialist registrars, and the availability of highly trained and experienced nursing personnel, the service needs of patients with chronic respiratory diseases attending routine outpatient clinics may be better provided by appropriately trained nurse practitioners. METHODS: A randomised controlled crossover trial was used to compare nurse practitioner led care with doctor led care in a bronchiectasis outpatient clinic. Eighty patients were recruited and randomised to receive 1 year of nurse led care and 1 year of doctor led care in random order. Patients were followed up for 2 years to ensure patient safety and acceptability and to assess differences in lung function. Outcome measures were forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), 12 minute walk test, health related quality of life, and resource use. RESULTS: The mean difference in FEV(1) was 0.2% predicted (95% confidence interval -1.6 to 2.0%, p=0.83). There were no significant differences in the other clinical or health related quality of life measures. Nurse led care resulted in significantly increased resource use compared with doctor led care (mean difference pound 1497, 95% confidence interval pound 688 to pound 2674, p<0.001), a large part of which resulted from the number and duration of hospital admissions. The mean difference in resource use was greater in the first year ( pound 2625) than in the second year ( pound 411). CONCLUSIONS: Nurse practitioner led care for stable patients within a chronic chest clinic is safe and is as effective as doctor led care, but may use more resources.
Authors: A L Stewart; S Greenfield; R D Hays; K Wells; W H Rogers; S D Berry; E A McGlynn; J E Ware Journal: JAMA Date: 1989-08-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: A W A Kamps; P L P Brand; J L L Kimpen; A R Maillé; A W Overgoor-van de Groes; L C J A M van Helsdingen-Peek; R J Roorda Journal: Thorax Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: N Torrance; J Mollison; S Wordsworth; J Gray; Z Miedzybrodzka; N Haites; A Grant; M Campbell; M S Watson; A Clarke; B Wilson Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2006-07-11 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Amanda McCullough; Elizabeth T Thomas; Cristin Ryan; Judy M Bradley; Brenda O'Neill; Stuart Elborn; Carmel Hughes Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2015-11-18
Authors: M J McDonnell; S Aliberti; P C Goeminne; K Dimakou; S C Zucchetti; J Davidson; C Ward; J G Laffey; S Finch; A Pesci; L J Dupont; T C Fardon; D Skrbic; D Obradovic; S Cowman; M R Loebinger; R M Rutherford; A De Soyza; J D Chalmers Journal: Thorax Date: 2016-08-11 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Amanda R McCullough; Michael M Tunney; J Stuart Elborn; Judy M Bradley; Carmel M Hughes Journal: Health Expect Date: 2014-06-20 Impact factor: 3.377