Literature DB >> 12149367

Large-scale screening of nasal swabs for Bacillus anthracis: descriptive summary and discussion of the National Institutes of Health's experience.

Pattarachai Kiratisin1, Caroline D Fukuda, Alexandra Wong, Frida Stock, Jeanne C Preuss, Laura Ediger, Trupti N Brahmbhatt, Steven H Fischer, Daniel P Fedorko, Frank G Witebsky, Vee J Gill.   

Abstract

In October 2001, a letter containing a large number of anthrax spores was sent through the Brentwood post office in Washington, D.C., to a United States Senate office on Capitol Hill, resulting in contamination in both places. Several thousand people who worked at these sites were screened for spore exposure by collecting nasal swab samples. We describe here a screening protocol which we, as a level A laboratory, used on very short notice to process a large number of specimens (3,936 swabs) in order to report preliminary results as quickly as possible. Six isolates from our screening met preliminary criteria for Bacillus anthracis identification and were referred for definitive testing. Although none of the isolates was later confirmed to be B. anthracis, we studied these isolates further to define their biochemical characteristics and 16S rRNA sequences. Four of the six isolates were identified as Bacillus megaterium, one was identified as Bacillus cereus, and one was an unidentifiable Bacillus sp. Our results suggest that large-scale nasal-swab screening for potential exposure to anthrax spores, particularly if not done immediately postexposure, may not be very effective for detecting B. anthracis but may detect a number of Bacillus spp. that are phenotypically very similar to B. anthracis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12149367      PMCID: PMC120640          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.8.3012-3016.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  13 in total

Review 1.  Bioterrorism: implications for the clinical microbiologist.

Authors:  W F Klietmann; K L Ruoff
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Biological and chemical terrorism: strategic plan for preparedness and response. Recommendations of the CDC Strategic Planning Workgroup.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2000-04-21

3.  Bioterrorism alleging use of anthrax and interim guidelines for management--United States, 1998.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1999-02-05       Impact factor: 17.586

4.  Comparison of noninvasive sampling sites for early detection of Bacillus anthracis spores from rhesus monkeys after aerosol exposure.

Authors:  A S Hail; C A Rossi; G V Ludwig; B E Ivins; R F Tammariello; E A Henchal
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.437

5.  Update: Investigation of anthrax associated with intentional exposure and interim public health guidelines, October 2001.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2001-10-19       Impact factor: 17.586

6.  The Sverdlovsk anthrax outbreak of 1979.

Authors:  M Meselson; J Guillemin; M Hugh-Jones; A Langmuir; I Popova; A Shelokov; O Yampolskaya
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Comparative analysis of Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, and related species on the basis of reverse transcriptase sequencing of 16S rRNA.

Authors:  C Ash; J A Farrow; M Dorsch; E Stackebrandt; M D Collins
Journal:  Int J Syst Bacteriol       Date:  1991-07

8.  Inhalation anthrax in a home craftsman.

Authors:  S C Suffin; W H Carnes; A F Kaufmann
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 9.  Definitive identification of Bacillus anthracis--a review.

Authors:  P C Turnbull
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.772

10.  Public health assessment of potential biological terrorism agents.

Authors:  Lisa D Rotz; Ali S Khan; Scott R Lillibridge; Stephen M Ostroff; James M Hughes
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  9 in total

1.  Searching for Bacillus anthracis in suspect powders: a French experience.

Authors:  Bernard La Scola; Pierre-Edouard Fournier; Didier Raoult
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  High throughput screening for spores and vegetative forms of pathogenic B. anthracis by an internally controlled real-time PCR assay with automated DNA preparation.

Authors:  Marcus Panning; Stefanie Kramme; Nadine Petersen; Christian Drosten
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Swab protocol for rapid laboratory diagnosis of cutaneous anthrax.

Authors:  Leslie A Dauphin; Chung K Marston; Vinod Bhullar; Daniel Baker; Mahmudur Rahman; M Jahangir Hossain; Apurba Chakraborty; Salah Uddin Khan; Alex R Hoffmaster
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of automated and manual commercial DNA extraction methods for recovery of Brucella DNA from suspensions and spiked swabs.

Authors:  Leslie A Dauphin; Rebecca J Hutchins; Liberty A Bost; Michael D Bowen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Transcriptional profiling of murine organ genes in response to infection with Bacillus anthracis Ames spores.

Authors:  Scott T Moen; Linsey A Yeager; William S Lawrence; Cindy Ponce; Cristi L Galindo; Harold R Garner; Wallace B Baze; Giovanni Suarez; Johnny W Peterson; Ashok K Chopra
Journal:  Microb Pathog       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 3.738

6.  Gamma irradiation can be used to inactivate Bacillus anthracis spores without compromising the sensitivity of diagnostic assays.

Authors:  Leslie A Dauphin; Bruce R Newton; Max V Rasmussen; Richard F Meyer; Michael D Bowen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Across-Shift Changes in Viable Nasal Bacteria among Waste-Incineration Plant Workers-A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Marcin Cyprowski; Anna Ławniczek-Wałczyk; Agata Stobnicka-Kupiec; Małgorzata Gołofit-Szymczak; Rafał L Górny
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  Screening laboratory requests.

Authors:  Cathy A Petti; Christopher R Polage; David R Hillyard
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Ruling out Bacillus anthracis.

Authors:  Joseph Papaparaskevas; Dimitra P Houhoula; Maria Papadimitriou; Georgios Saroglou; Nicholas J Legakis; Loukia Zerva
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.883

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.