OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of NSAID use on current routine upper GI endoscopy (UGIE) and to compare the lesions found in NSAID users and non-users. METHODS: Participating gastroenterologists consecutively documented outpatients with and without suspicion of bleeding, referred for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Patient characteristics, presence of risk factors, NSAID use and endoscopic findings were reported on standard data collection forms. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 2685 non-bleeding and 159 bleeding patients were enrolled within a time period of 2 months. NSAID therapy was present in 20% of the non-bleeding patients and at least 9% of referrals for endoscopy were directly related to suspected NSAID adverse events. Nearly half of acute bleeding patients (42%) were NSAID users, including aspirin for cardioprevention. Warning digestive symptoms prior to acute bleeding were frequently absent (56%). Oesophagitis was the main endoscopic diagnosis (51% of patients). Gastroduodenal (GD) ulcer was significantly more frequent in NSAID users, whereas oesophagitis and bleeding oesophageal varices were more frequent among non-users. Analysis of odds ratio's demonstrated NSAID use to significantly increase the risk for gastric ulcer in the whole patient group (OR = 2.73; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.98-3.77; p < 0.001) and, in addition, for duodenal ulcer in the elderly (> 65 y) subgroup (OR = 2.91; 95% CI: 1.52-5.59; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This survey confirms the high incidence of GD ulcers in NSAID users and the risk for serious gastrointestinal complications, often occurring without warning symptoms. It underlines the impact of NSAID use on the routine endoscopy load, the necessity of careful selection of patients for NSAID prescriptions and the need for gastropreventive measures, particularly in elderly patients and patients associating multiple risk factors.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of NSAID use on current routine upper GI endoscopy (UGIE) and to compare the lesions found in NSAID users and non-users. METHODS: Participating gastroenterologists consecutively documented outpatients with and without suspicion of bleeding, referred for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Patient characteristics, presence of risk factors, NSAID use and endoscopic findings were reported on standard data collection forms. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 2685 non-bleeding and 159 bleedingpatients were enrolled within a time period of 2 months. NSAID therapy was present in 20% of the non-bleedingpatients and at least 9% of referrals for endoscopy were directly related to suspected NSAID adverse events. Nearly half of acute bleedingpatients (42%) were NSAID users, including aspirin for cardioprevention. Warning digestive symptoms prior to acute bleeding were frequently absent (56%). Oesophagitis was the main endoscopic diagnosis (51% of patients). Gastroduodenal (GD) ulcer was significantly more frequent in NSAID users, whereas oesophagitis and bleeding oesophageal varices were more frequent among non-users. Analysis of odds ratio's demonstrated NSAID use to significantly increase the risk for gastric ulcer in the whole patient group (OR = 2.73; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.98-3.77; p < 0.001) and, in addition, for duodenal ulcer in the elderly (> 65 y) subgroup (OR = 2.91; 95% CI: 1.52-5.59; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This survey confirms the high incidence of GD ulcers in NSAID users and the risk for serious gastrointestinal complications, often occurring without warning symptoms. It underlines the impact of NSAID use on the routine endoscopy load, the necessity of careful selection of patients for NSAID prescriptions and the need for gastropreventive measures, particularly in elderly patients and patients associating multiple risk factors.