Literature DB >> 12147912

Using Rasch measurement to investigate the cross-form equivalence and clinical utility of Spanish and English versions of a diabetes questionnaire: a pilot study.

Ben Gerber1, Everett V Smith, Mariela Girotti, Lourdes Pelaez, Kimberly Lawless, Louanne Smolin, Irwin Brodsky, Arnold Eiser.   

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to use Rasch measurement to study the psychometric properties of data obtained from a newly developed Diabetes Questionnaire designed to measure diabetes knowledge, attitudes, and self-care. Specifically, a methodology using principles of Rasch measurement for investigating the cross-form equivalence of English and Spanish versions of the Diabetes Questionnaire was employed. A total of fifty diabetes patients responded to the questionnaire, with 26 participants completing the English version. Analyses detected problems with the attitude items. We attributed the scaling problems to the use of negatively worded items with participants having generally low educational backgrounds. Analysis of the knowledge and self-care items yielded unidimensional variables with clinically meaningful item hierarchies that may have relevance to treatment protocols. Furthermore, the knowledge and the self-care items from the two versions of the Diabetes Questionnaire met our criteria for establishing cross-form equivalence and thus allow quantitative comparisons of person measures across versions. Limitations of the study and suggested refinements of the Diabetes Questionnaire are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12147912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Meas        ISSN: 1529-7713


  2 in total

1.  Using Rasch analysis to test the cross-cultural item equivalence of the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire and the Hopkins Symptom Checklist across Vietnamese and Cambodian immigrant mothers.

Authors:  Yoonsun Choi; Amy Mericle; Tracy W Harachi
Journal:  J Appl Meas       Date:  2006

2.  Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Diabetes: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Priscilla Jia Ling Wee; Yu Heng Kwan; Dionne Hui Fang Loh; Jie Kie Phang; Troy H Puar; Truls Østbye; Julian Thumboo; Sungwon Yoon; Lian Leng Low
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 5.428

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.