Literature DB >> 12145072

The efficacy, side effects, and recovery characteristics of dexmedetomidine versus propofol when used for intraoperative sedation.

Shahbaz R Arain1, Thomas J Ebert.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We evaluated the cardio-respiratory effects of equi-sedative doses of dexmedetomidine and propofol for intraoperative sedation. Secondary comparison end points were time to achieve and terminate sedation and postoperative analgesia and psychomotor performance. Forty patients scheduled for elective surgery provided informed consent and were randomized equally to receive either dexmedetomidine (1 microg/kg initial loading dose for 10 min; maintenance, 0.4-0.7 microg. kg(-1). h(-1)) or propofol (75 microg. kg(-1). min(-1) x 10 min; maintenance, 12.5-75 microg. kg(-1). min(-1)). Hemodynamic variables (heart rate and mean arterial blood pressure), sedation (visual analog scale and Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation), bispectral index score of sedation, ventilation (respiratory rate, O2 sat, and ETCO2), psychomotor performance (digital symbol substitution test), and pain (visual analog scale) were determined during surgery and up to 95 min after surgery. Intraoperative sedation levels were targeted to achieve a bispectral index score of 70-80. Patient demographics, ASA class, surgical procedure, and baseline cardio-respiratory variables were similar between groups. Sedation was achieved more rapidly with propofol but was similar between groups 25 min after initiating infusions. The average infusion rate for dexmedetomidine was 0.7 microg. kg(-1). h(-1) and 38 microg. kg(-1). min(-1) for propofol. There were no differences between groups in psychomotor performance and respiratory rate during recovery. The previous use of dexmedetomidine resulted in more sedation, lower blood pressure, and improved analgesia (less morphine use) in recovery. IMPLICATIONS: Dexmedetomidine may be useful for perioperative sedation. It has a slower onset and offset of sedation compared with propofol. Dexmedetomidine was associated with improved analgesia and less morphine use in the postoperative period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12145072     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200208000-00042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  90 in total

Review 1.  Regional anaesthesia with sedation protocol to safely debride sacral pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Daniel K O'Neill; Bryan Robins; Elizabeth A Ayello; Germaine Cuff; Patrick Linton; Harold Brem
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  The effect of dexmedetomidine on arterial-cardiac baroreflex function assessed by spectral and transfer function analysis.

Authors:  Toru Ehara; Yojiro Ogawa; Jitsu Kato; Ken Aoki; Setsuro Ogawa; Ken-ichi Iwasaki
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Sedation during noninvasive mechanical ventilation with dexmedetomidine or midazolam: A randomized, double-blind, prospective study.

Authors:  Nimet Senoglu; Hafize Oksuz; Zafer Dogan; Huseyin Yildiz; Hilmi Demirkiran; Hasan Ekerbicer
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2010-06

4.  The comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam used for sedation of patients during upper endoscopy: A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Yavuz Demiraran; Esin Korkut; Ali Tamer; Ilknur Yorulmaz; Buket Kocaman; Gulbin Sezen; Yusuf Akcan
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 5.  Perioperative Care of Elderly Surgical Outpatients.

Authors:  Xuezhao Cao; Paul F White; Hong Ma
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  Preliminary experience with a combination of dexmedetomidine and propofol infusions for diagnostic cardiac catheterization in children.

Authors:  Punkaj Gupta; Joseph D Tobias; Sunali Goyal; Martin D Miller; Michael M De Moor; Natan Noviski; Vipin Mehta
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2009-04

7.  Update on dexmedetomidine: use in nonintubated patients requiring sedation for surgical procedures.

Authors:  Mohanad Shukry; Jeffrey A Miller
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  Undiagnosed catecholamine-secreting paraganglioma and coexisting carcinoid in a patient with MH susceptibility: an unusual anesthetic challenge.

Authors:  Jana Hudcova; Roman Schumann
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  Effect of sedation on pain perception.

Authors:  Michael A Frölich; Kui Zhang; Timothy J Ness
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Comparison of Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketamine-Propofol Combination for Sedation in Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  Özgür Yağan; Refika Hande Karakahya; Nilay Taş; Ahmet Küçük
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2015-02-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.