Literature DB >> 12145066

A comparison of three anesthetic techniques in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial intracranial surgery.

Pekka Talke1, James E Caldwell, Ronald Brown, Barbara Dodson, Joan Howley, Charles A Richardson.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Several anesthetic techniques have been used successfully to provide anesthesia for resection of intracranial supratentorial mass lesions. One technique used to enhance recovery involves changing anesthesia from vapor-based to propofol-based for cranial closure. However, there are no data to support a beneficial effect of this approach in the immediate postoperative period after craniotomy. We evaluated 3 anesthetic techniques in 60 patients undergoing elective surgery for supratentorial mass lesions. Patients were randomly assigned to three anesthesia study groups: propofol infusion, isoflurane inhalation, and these two techniques combined. In the combination group, once the dura was closed, isoflurane was discontinued and propofol infusion simultaneously started. We studied intra- and postoperative hemodynamics and several recovery variables for 2 h after the end of anesthesia. Baseline and average intraoperative blood pressure and heart rate values did not differ among the groups. Heart rate and blood pressure increased similarly in all groups in response to intubation and pin placement and postoperatively. None of the recovery event times (open eyes, extubation, follow commands, oriented, Aldrete score) or psychomotor test performance differed significantly. We conclude that the sequential administration of isoflurane and propofol did not provide earlier recovery and cognition than the intraoperative use of isoflurane alone. IMPLICATIONS: We evaluated three anesthetic techniques with and without propofol in patients undergoing elective surgery for supratentorial mass lesions by using a prospective, randomized clinical study design and found that the three anesthetics did not differ in intra- or postoperative hemodynamic stability or early postoperative recovery variables.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12145066     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-200208000-00036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  10 in total

1.  Neuroanesthesia management of neurosurgery of brain stem tumor requiring neurophysiology monitoring in an iMRI OT setting.

Authors:  Abdulrahmam J Sabbagh; Mahmoud Al-Yamany; Reem F Bunyan; Mohamad S M Takrouri; Sabry Mohammed Radwan
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2009-07

2.  Superior recovery profiles of propofol-based regimen as compared to isoflurane-based regimen in patients undergoing craniotomy for primary brain tumor excision: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Yoshihide Miura; Kouhei Kamiya; Kaoru Kanazawa; Masayuki Okada; Masaki Nakane; Airi Kumasaka; Kaneyuki Kawamae
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Comparison of total intravenous anesthesia vs. inhalational anesthesia on brain relaxation, intracranial pressure, and hemodynamics in patients with acute subdural hematoma undergoing emergency craniotomy: a randomized control trial.

Authors:  Jayakumar Preethi; Prasanna Udupi Bidkar; Anusha Cherian; Ankita Dey; Swaminathan Srinivasan; Sethuramachandran Adinarayanan; Andy Sadanand Ramesh
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Patients selection for awake neurosurgery.

Authors:  J D Dreier; B Williams; D Mangar; E M Camporesi
Journal:  HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth       Date:  2009

5.  Slack brain in meningioma surgery through lateral supraorbital approach.

Authors:  Rossana Romani; Marja Silvasti-Lundell; Aki Laakso; Hanna Tuominen; Juha Hernesniemi; Tomi Niemi
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2011-11-19

6.  Effect of prophylactic palonosetron and sugammadex on postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing microvascular decompression under propofol-maintained anesthesia: A retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Hee Yong Kang; Sung Wook Park; Sangho Lee; Jong-Mi Jeon; In Duk Oh; Jeong-Hyun Choi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 7.  Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction.

Authors:  Indu Kapoor; Hemanshu Prabhakar; Charu Mahajan
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-06

8.  Anaesthesiological strategies in elective craniotomy: randomized, equivalence, open trial--the NeuroMorfeo trial.

Authors:  Giuseppe Citerio; Maria Grazia Franzosi; Roberto Latini; Serge Masson; Simona Barlera; Stefano Guzzetti; Antonio Pesenti
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 9.  Effects of Anesthetic Management on Early Postoperative Recovery, Hemodynamics and Pain After Supratentorial Craniotomy.

Authors:  Eugenia Ayrian; Alan David Kaye; Chelsia L Varner; Carolina Guerra; Nalini Vadivelu; Richard D Urman; Vladimir Zelman; Philip D Lumb; Giovanni Rosa; Federico Bilotta
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2015-08-23

10.  Efficacy and safety of sevoflurane vs propofol in combination with remifentanil for anesthesia maintenance during craniotomy: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zheng Zhou; Miaofa Ying; Rui Zhao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.