OBJECTIVES: This study examined the usefulness of computer-assisted active surveillance in identifying maternal deaths in New York City. METHODS: Computerized searches of hospital discharge and autopsy record databases were conducted for maternal deaths occurring in 1997. RESULTS: Active surveillance revealed 14 new maternal deaths not previously reported, an 88% increase. Nine of these deaths were found through the hospital discharge database search, 1 was found through the autopsy record search, and 4 were found in both searches. Overall maternal mortality ratios associated with active surveillance and routine surveillance were 24.3 and 13.0 deaths per 100 000 live births, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Active surveillance of maternal mortality is useful in identifying new maternal deaths. Existing databases can be used relatively easily to augment routine surveillance of maternal mortality.
OBJECTIVES: This study examined the usefulness of computer-assisted active surveillance in identifying maternal deaths in New York City. METHODS: Computerized searches of hospital discharge and autopsy record databases were conducted for maternal deaths occurring in 1997. RESULTS: Active surveillance revealed 14 new maternal deaths not previously reported, an 88% increase. Nine of these deaths were found through the hospital discharge database search, 1 was found through the autopsy record search, and 4 were found in both searches. Overall maternal mortality ratios associated with active surveillance and routine surveillance were 24.3 and 13.0 deaths per 100 000 live births, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Active surveillance of maternal mortality is useful in identifying new maternal deaths. Existing databases can be used relatively easily to augment routine surveillance of maternal mortality.
Authors: N Schuitemaker; J Van Roosmalen; G Dekker; P Van Dongen; H Van Geijn; J B Gravenhorst Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Carla AbouZahr; Don de Savigny; Lene Mikkelsen; Philip W Setel; Rafael Lozano; Erin Nichols; Francis Notzon; Alan D Lopez Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-05-10 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Preeti H Negandhi; Sutapa B Neogi; Sapna Chopra; Amit Phogat; Rupinder Sahota; Ravikant Gupta; Rakesh Gupta; Sanjay Zodpey Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2016-05-02 Impact factor: 9.408