Literature DB >> 12144823

Micropapillary serous ovarian carcinoma: surgical management and clinical outcome.

Robert E Bristow1, Dana R Gossett, David R Shook, Mariana L Zahurak, Rafael S Tomacruz, Deborah K Armstrong, F J Montz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to characterize the prognostic features of micropapillary serous ovarian carcinoma (MPSC), examine the clinical impact of surgical staging, and define the role of cytoreductive surgery for patients with advanced disease.
METHODS: Fifty-one patients with MPSC were identified from hospital and tumor registry databases. Demographic, operative, pathologic, and follow-up data were abstracted retrospectively. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and statistical comparisons were performed using the log rank test, logistic regression analysis, and the Cox proportional hazards regression model.
RESULTS: The median age at diagnosis was 45 years, and follow-up extended to a median of 43.0 months. Stage I/II disease was present in 25.5% of patients and no disease-related deaths were observed in this group. Stage III disease was discovered in 29.4% of patients with tumor clinically confined to the ovaries. Stage III/IV disease (74.5% of cases) was associated with median progression-free and overall survival times of 32.8 and 114.2 months, respectively. Menopausal status and the anatomic extent of disease were significantly associated with survival outcome. However, the strongest independent predictor of survival for patients with advanced disease was the amount of residual tumor. Median overall survival for patients with optimal cytoreduction (residual disease </=1 cm) was 115.4 months compared to 43.1 months for those with >1 cm residual tumor (P < 0.0002).
CONCLUSIONS: MPSC carries a significant risk of extraovarian spread; however, adequately sampled Stage I/II disease is associated with a favorable prognosis. Optimal cytoreduction is associated with improved survival and should be the primary therapeutic objective for patients with advanced-stage MPSC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12144823     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2002.6736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  8 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of borderline ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Daniela Fischerova; Michal Zikan; Pavel Dundr; David Cibula
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-09-28

2.  Risk factors for recurrence of ovarian borderline tumors.

Authors:  K K Shih; Q Zhou; J Huh; J C Morgan; A Iasonos; C Aghajanian; D S Chi; R R Barakat; N R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Serum human epididymis protein 4 and risk for ovarian malignancy algorithm as new diagnostic and prognostic tools for epithelial ovarian cancer management.

Authors:  Elisabetta Bandiera; Chiara Romani; Claudia Specchia; Laura Zanotti; Claudio Galli; Giuseppina Ruggeri; Germana Tognon; Eliana Bignotti; Renata A Tassi; Franco Odicino; Luigi Caimi; Enrico Sartori; Alessandro D Santin; Sergio Pecorelli; Antonella Ravaggi
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Patterns of recurrence and role of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II-IV serous ovarian borderline tumors.

Authors:  Karin K Shih; Qin C Zhou; Carol Aghajanian; Jae Huh; Robert A Soslow; Jessica C Morgan; Alexia Iasonos; Dennis S Chi; Richard R Barakat; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Quality of life from cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer: Investigating the association between disease burden and surgical complexity in the international, prospective, SOCQER-2 cohort study.

Authors:  Sudha Sundar; Carole Cummins; Satyam Kumar; Joanna Long; Vivek Arora; Janos Balega; Tim Broadhead; Tim Duncan; Richard Edmondson; Christina Fotopoulou; Ros Glasspool; Desiree Kolomainen; Simon Leeson; Ranjit Manchanda; Orla McNally; Jo Morrison; Asima Mukhopadhyay; Jim Paul; John Tidy; Nick Wood
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 7.331

6.  Prognosis and Prognostic Factors of Serous Borderline Tumor-Micropapillary Variant: Retrospective Study of 200 Patients with Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Shuang-Zheng Jia; Hong-Wen Yao; Ning Li; Jun-Jun Yang; Yang Xiang; Shan Zheng; Jin-Hua Leng; Ling-Ying Wu
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 4.501

7.  High preoperative blood levels of HE4 predicts poor prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Grigorios Kalapotharakos; Christine Asciutto; Emir Henic; Bertil Casslén; Christer Borgfeldt
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 4.234

8.  KRAS or BRAF mutation status is a useful predictor of sensitivity to MEK inhibition in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  N Nakayama; K Nakayama; S Yeasmin; M Ishibashi; A Katagiri; K Iida; M Fukumoto; K Miyazaki
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.