V Hietschold1, T Kittner, S Appold, N Abolmaali, M Laniado. 1. Institut und Poliklinik für Radiologische Diagnostik, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany. Volker.Hietschold@mailbox.TU-Dresden.de
Abstract
AIM: In MR perfusion measurements of contrast uptaking lesions, time intensity curves are hampered by T 1 shortening as well as by the change of T 2 * due to interstitial contrast material (CM). Using double echo sequences, the influence of T 1 can be mathematically eliminated. For correction of the T 2 * influence an empirical algorithm using time-intensity-curves exclusively measured in the suspected lesion is proposed. METHODS: The interstitial CM concentration is assumed to be proportional to the change of the intensity for T E = 0 or to the change of the relaxation rate DeltaR 1 respectively. The intravascular CM concentration is estimated from DeltaR 2 *. It is adjusted to zero for a time point sufficiently late after the bolus injection by subtraction of the interstitial concentration. This method was applied to double echo FLASH measurements on 15 pharyngeal tumors. RESULTS: The proposed correction transforms the time dependence of the estimated intravascular CM concentration into a plausible course. CONCLUSION: Double echo perfusion measurements can be corrected for the interstitial CM induced T 2 * shortening without additional measurements with proneness to errors. This does not necessarily improve the diagnostic value, since possibly "implied multivariate aspects" of uncorrected parameters (here: contrast uptake of the lesion is related to tumor neoangiogenesis as well) are eliminated.
AIM: In MR perfusion measurements of contrast uptaking lesions, time intensity curves are hampered by T 1 shortening as well as by the change of T 2 * due to interstitial contrast material (CM). Using double echo sequences, the influence of T 1 can be mathematically eliminated. For correction of the T 2 * influence an empirical algorithm using time-intensity-curves exclusively measured in the suspected lesion is proposed. METHODS: The interstitial CM concentration is assumed to be proportional to the change of the intensity for T E = 0 or to the change of the relaxation rate DeltaR 1 respectively. The intravascular CM concentration is estimated from DeltaR 2 *. It is adjusted to zero for a time point sufficiently late after the bolus injection by subtraction of the interstitial concentration. This method was applied to double echo FLASH measurements on 15 pharyngeal tumors. RESULTS: The proposed correction transforms the time dependence of the estimated intravascular CM concentration into a plausible course. CONCLUSION: Double echo perfusion measurements can be corrected for the interstitial CM induced T 2 * shortening without additional measurements with proneness to errors. This does not necessarily improve the diagnostic value, since possibly "implied multivariate aspects" of uncorrected parameters (here: contrast uptake of the lesion is related to tumor neoangiogenesis as well) are eliminated.