Literature DB >> 12140636

Prospective randomized evaluation of surgical resident proficiency with laparoscopic suturing after course instruction.

K L Harold1, B D Matthews, C L Backus, B L Pratt, B T Heniford.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic suturing is required to develop competency in advanced laparoscopy.
METHODS: Manuals detailing laparoscopic suturing were give to 17 Surgery residents. One week later they performed a suture on a training model. Time (s), accuracy (mm), and knot strength (lb) were recorded. The residents were blindly randomized to intervention (n = 9) and control (n = 8) groups. The intervention residents attended a 60-min course with lecture, video, and individual proctoring. Two weeks later they performed a stitch with standard laparoscopic instruments and a stitch with a suturing assist device. Statistical analysis included a Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
RESULTS: The intervention residents decreased their suturing time from the first to the second stitich (732.4-257.6s), the control and residents decreased their time from 500.2 s to 421.8 s. The time required to perform the second stitch showed no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.46), but the difference in reduced time between the first and second stitch was significant (p = 0.001). Using the suturing assist device for the third suture, the intervention and control groups both decreased their times significantly. The control residents performed almost as quickly as the intervention residents with the suturing; device (p = 0.11). Accuracy and knot strength were not different in any test.
CONCLUSIONS: Residents can improve suturing skill with a short didactic course and individual proctoring. A suturing assist device decreases time required by inexperienced surgeons to device perform an intracorporeal tie.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12140636     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-8832-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  10 in total

1.  Validation of a six-task simulation model in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  M Uchal; Y Raftopoulos; J Tjugum; R Bergamaschi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Prospective randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic trainers for basic laparoscopic skills acquisition.

Authors:  A K Madan; C T Frantzides
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Transfer validity of laparoscopic knot-tying training on a VR simulator to a realistic environment: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  E G G Verdaasdonk; J Dankelman; J F Lange; L P S Stassen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Nonsurgical skills do not predict baseline scores in inanimate box or virtual-reality trainers.

Authors:  Atul K Madan; Jason L Harper; Constantine T Frantzides; David S Tichansky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Do hybrid simulator-generated metrics correlate with content-valid outcome measures?

Authors:  Paul Cesanek; Miroslav Uchal; Selman Uranues; Joseph Patruno; Christina Gogal; Sharon Kimmel; Roberto Bergamaschi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Predictors of technical skill acquisition among resident trainees in a laparoscopic skills education program.

Authors:  Corey Van Hove; Kyle A Perry; Donn H Spight; Krissy Wheeler-Mcinvaille; Brian S Diggs; Brett C Sheppard; Blair A Jobe; Robert W O'Rourke
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Establishing meaningful benchmarks: the development of a formative feedback tool for advanced laparoscopic suturing.

Authors:  Katherine M McKendy; Yusuke Watanabe; Elif Bilgic; Ghada Enani; Amani Munshi; Lawrence Lee; Liane S Feldman; Gerald M Fried; Melina C Vassiliou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Surgical simulation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Leanne M Sutherland; Philippa F Middleton; Adrian Anthony; Jeffrey Hamdorf; Patrick Cregan; David Scott; Guy J Maddern
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Development and Feasibility of a Robotic Laparoscopic Clipping Tool for Wound Closure and Anastomosis.

Authors:  Axel Krieger; Justin Opfermann; Peter C W Kim
Journal:  J Med Device       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 0.582

10.  Evaluation of specialized laparoscopic suturing and tying devices.

Authors:  Atul K Madan; Constantine T Frantzides; Christopher L Tebbit; William C Park; Nakka V Aruna Kumari; Nina Shervin
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2004 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.