D E Bentley1, P D Youell, A K P Jones. 1. Human Pain Research Group, University of Manchester Rheumatic Diseases Centre, Clinical Sciences Building, Hope Hospital, Eccles Old Road, Salford, UK. deborah.bentley@man.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To (i) accurately localize the cingulate source of late laser evoked potentials (LEPs) using a realistic head model incorporating the individual's anatomy and (ii) assess the within-subject reproducibility of this source. METHODS: Late LEPs, elicited by painful CO2 laser stimulation of the right forearm, were recorded from 62 electrodes in one healthy subject. This was repeated 9 times, over 3 different days. Dipole source localization (CURRY 4.0) was performed on the most prominent (P2) peak of each LEP data set, using a head model derived from the subject's structural magnetic resonance image. RESULTS: In all cases the P2 LEP peak was best explained by a dipole located close to the border of the caudal division of left anterior cingulate cortex with left posterior cingulate cortex (mean residual variance was 1.7+/-0.4%). The maximum standard deviation from the mean dipole location was 3.2 mm. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the location of the cingulate source of late LEPs is highly reproducible within this subject, when analyzed in this way, and suggests involvement of caudal cingulate regions in pain processing.
OBJECTIVES: To (i) accurately localize the cingulate source of late laser evoked potentials (LEPs) using a realistic head model incorporating the individual's anatomy and (ii) assess the within-subject reproducibility of this source. METHODS: Late LEPs, elicited by painful CO2 laser stimulation of the right forearm, were recorded from 62 electrodes in one healthy subject. This was repeated 9 times, over 3 different days. Dipole source localization (CURRY 4.0) was performed on the most prominent (P2) peak of each LEP data set, using a head model derived from the subject's structural magnetic resonance image. RESULTS: In all cases the P2 LEP peak was best explained by a dipole located close to the border of the caudal division of left anterior cingulate cortex with left posterior cingulate cortex (mean residual variance was 1.7+/-0.4%). The maximum standard deviation from the mean dipole location was 3.2 mm. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the location of the cingulate source of late LEPs is highly reproducible within this subject, when analyzed in this way, and suggests involvement of caudal cingulate regions in pain processing.
Authors: Eulália Silva dos Santos Pinheiro; Fernanda Costa de Queirós; Pedro Montoya; Cleber Luz Santos; Marion Alves do Nascimento; Clara Hikari Ito; Manuela Silva; David Barros Nunes Santos; Silvia Benevides; José Garcia Vivas Miranda; Katia Nunes Sá; Abrahão Fontes Baptista Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-02-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Michael Hauck; Jürgen Lorenz; Roger Zimmermann; Stefan Debener; Eckehard Scharein; Andreas K Engel Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2007-02-08 Impact factor: 2.064
Authors: Boudewijn van den Berg; Mana Manoochehri; Alfred C Schouten; Frans C T van der Helm; Jan R Buitenweg Journal: Brain Topogr Date: 2022-01-20 Impact factor: 3.020