Literature DB >> 12140009

Different patterns of excitation and inhibition of the small hand and forearm muscles from magnetic brain stimulation in humans.

Lin Wu1, Yoshinobu Goto, Takayuki Taniwaki, Naoko Kinukawa, Shozo Tobimatsu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the present study is to quantify the effects of voluntary muscle contraction of the small hand (abductor pollicis brevis, first dorsal interosseus (FDI)) and forearm muscles (extensor carpi radialis (ECR), extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU), flexor carpi radialis (FCR) and flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU)) on motor evoked potentials (MEPs).
METHODS: MEPs were recorded in 12 healthy subjects by a circular coil placed over the vertex at 1.2 times the resting motor threshold at different levels of the muscle contraction (0-100% of maximum voluntary contraction (MVC)). The effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on the onset latency, MEP area and silent period (SP) as a function of the %MVC were evaluated using a piecewise linear regression analysis.
RESULTS: The MEP areas for the small hand muscles were almost completely saturated at 20% of MVC. In contrast, the MEP areas for radial muscles (ECR, FCR) had a dual increase at 40% of MVC while the ulnar muscles (ECU, FCU) had a dual increase at 20% of MVC. A uniform latency shift (1.5-3 ms reduction) was observed in all muscles with a changing point at 10% of MVC. The SPs were the longest for FDI and were not significantly influenced by MVC for any muscles.
CONCLUSIONS: The excitatory and inhibitory effects of TMS on the MEPs differed for the small hand and forearm muscles and also between the ulnar and radial muscles. These results probably resulted from the different degrees of direct corticomotoneuronal inputs to each muscle and the inherent properties of the spinal motoneurons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12140009     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00160-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  13 in total

1.  Effects of combined cortical and acoustic stimuli on muscle activity.

Authors:  R J Fisher; A Sharott; A A Kühn; P Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Functional demanded excitability changes of human hand motor area.

Authors:  Zhen Ni; Makoto Takahashi; Takamasa Yamashita; Nan Liang; Yoshiyuki Tanaka; Toshio Tsuji; Susumu Yahagi; Tatsuya Kasai
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Disinhibition of upper limb motor area by voluntary contraction of the lower limb muscle.

Authors:  Toshiki Tazoe; Takashi Endoh; Tsuyoshi Nakajima; Masanori Sakamoto; Tomoyoshi Komiyama
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Task-specific increase in corticomotor excitability during tactile discrimination.

Authors:  Sabah Master; François Tremblay
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Automated-parameterization of the motor evoked potential and cortical silent period induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Christopher A Rábago; Jack L Lancaster; Shalini Narayana; Wei Zhang; Peter T Fox
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Modulation of the cortical silent period elicited by single- and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Sho Kojima; Hideaki Onishi; Kazuhiro Sugawara; Hikari Kirimoto; Makoto Suzuki; Hiroyuki Tamaki
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.288

7.  Definition dependent properties of the cortical silent period in upper-extremity muscles, a methodological study.

Authors:  Annette Aa van Kuijk; Chantal D Bakker; Jan Cm Hendriks; Alexander Ch Geurts; Dick F Stegeman; Jaco W Pasman
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Evaluation of the Cortical Silent Period of the Laryngeal Motor Cortex in Healthy Individuals.

Authors:  Mo Chen; Rebekah L S Summers; George S Goding; Sharyl Samargia; Christy L Ludlow; Cecília N Prudente; Teresa J Kimberley
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Anatomical variations of the pronator teres muscle in a Central European population and its clinical significance.

Authors:  Łukasz Olewnik; Michał Podgórski; Michał Polguj; Grzegorz Wysiadecki; Mirosław Topol
Journal:  Anat Sci Int       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 1.741

10.  A higher number of TMS-elicited MEP from a combined hotspot improves intra- and inter-session reliability of the upper limb muscles in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Andisheh Bastani; Shapour Jaberzadeh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.