Literature DB >> 12139908

Women's experiences of continuity of midwifery care in a randomised controlled trial in Australia.

Caroline S E Homer1, Gregory K Davis, Margaret Cooke, Lesley M Barclay.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to compare the experiences of women who received a new model of continuity of midwifery care with those who received standard hospital care during pregnancy, labour, birth and the postnatal period.
DESIGN: a randomised controlled trial was conducted. One thousand and eighty-nine women were randomly allocated to either the new model of care, the St George Outreach Maternity Project (STOMP), or standard care. Women completed a postal questionnaire eight to ten weeks after the birth. PARTICIPANTS: women in the trial were of mixed obstetric risk status and more than half the sample were born in a non-English speaking country.
FINDINGS: questionnaires were returned from 69% of consenting women. STOMP women were significantly more likely to have talked with their midwives and doctors about their personal preferences for childbirth and more likely to report that they knew enough about aspects of labour and birth, particularly induction of labour, pain relief and caesarean section. Almost 80% of women in the STOMP group experienced continuity of care, that is, one of their team midwives was present, during labour and birth. STOMP women reported a significantly higher 'sense of control during labour and birth'. Sixty-three per cent of STOMP women reported that they 'knew' the midwife who cared for them during labour compared with 21% of control women. In a secondary analysis, women who had a midwife during labour who they felt that they knew, had a significantly higher sense of 'control' and a more positive birth experience compared with women who reported an unknown midwife. Postnatal care elicited the greatest number of negative comments from women in both the STOMP and the control group.
CONCLUSION: The reorganisation of maternity services to enable women to receive continuity of care has benefits for women. The benefits of a known labour midwife needs further research. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12139908     DOI: 10.1054/midw.2002.0298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  11 in total

1.  Midwifery care and patient-provider communication in maternity decisions in the United States.

Authors:  Katy B Kozhimannil; Laura B Attanasio; Y Tony Yang; Melissa D Avery; Eugene Declercq
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-07

2.  A direct comparison of patient-reported outcomes and experiences in alternative models of maternity care in Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  Yvette D Miller; Jessica Tone; Sutapa Talukdar; Elizabeth Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Continuity of midwifery care and gestational weight gain in obese women: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Cate Nagle; Helen Skouteris; Anne Hotchin; Lauren Bruce; Denise Patterson; Glyn Teale
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Staffing in postnatal units: is it adequate for the provision of quality care? Staff perspectives from a state-wide review of postnatal care in Victoria, Australia.

Authors:  Della A Forster; Helen L McLachlan; Jane Yelland; Jo Rayner; Judith Lumley; Mary-Ann Davey
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  What women want: qualitative analysis of consumer evaluations of maternity care in Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  Loretta C McKinnon; Samantha J Prosser; Yvette D Miller
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 6.  Health system and community level interventions for improving antenatal care coverage and health outcomes.

Authors:  Lawrence Mbuagbaw; Nancy Medley; Andrea J Darzi; Marty Richardson; Kesso Habiba Garga; Pierre Ongolo-Zogo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-01

Review 7.  Midwife-led continuity models versus other models of care for childbearing women.

Authors:  Jane Sandall; Hora Soltani; Simon Gates; Andrew Shennan; Declan Devane
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-28

8.  The early postnatal period: exploring women's views, expectations and experiences of care using focus groups in Victoria, Australia.

Authors:  Della A Forster; Helen L McLachlan; Jo Rayner; Jane Yelland; Lisa Gold; Sharon Rayner
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  A literature review on integrated perinatal care.

Authors:  Charo Rodríguez; Catherine des Rivières-Pigeon
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 5.120

Review 10.  Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander maternal and child health and wellbeing: a systematic search of programs and services in Australian primary health care settings.

Authors:  Crystal Jongen; Janya McCalman; Roxanne Bainbridge; Komla Tsey
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.