Oxygen costs of left ventricular contractility for dobutamine and Ca(2+) in normal rat hearts and the cost for dobutamine in Ca(2+) overload-induced failing hearts.

The aim of the present study was to compare the oxygen (O(2)) cost of left ventricular (LV) contractility (equivalent maximal elastance; eEmax, an index for contractility) for dobutamine (a beta-receptor stimulant) with that for calcium (Ca(2+)) in normal rat hearts and to assess the O(2) cost of LV eEmax for dobutamine in Ca(2+) overload-induced failing rat hearts. The mean O(2) cost of LV eEmax (x10(-4) microl O(2) x beat(-1) x mmHg(-1) x ml x g(-2)) for Ca(2+) was 1.30+/-0.37 in 12 normal hearts, and for dobutamine it was 1.26+/-0.30 in eight different normal hearts. In the same five normal hearts, the mean O(2) cost of LV eEmax for dobutamine was 1.15+/-0.27, and for Ca(2+) it was 0.81+/-0.36. These mean values showed no significant differences between Ca(2+) and dobutamine. In five Ca(2+) overload-induced failing hearts, the mean O(2) cost of LV eEmax for Ca(2+) could not be assessed, but the mean O(2) cost of LV eEmax for dobutamine was 1.04+/-0.40. This mean value for dobutamine did not differ significantly from those (see above 1.26+/-0.30 or 1.15+/-0.27) in the normal hearts. The present results indicate, in terms of the coupling of mechanical work and energetics of the heart, that the total Ca(2+) handling VO(2) in excitation-contraction coupling against unit LV contractility change for dobutamine in the contractile failing hearts does not differ from that in the normal hearts. This suggests that in the Ca(2+) overload-induced contractile failing hearts, there were no changes in the sensitivity of the contractile machinery for Ca(2+), in the Ca(2+)/ATP in the total Ca(2+) handling, and in the ATP/VO(2) in the mitochondria.