Literature DB >> 12139367

The tolerability and safety of cholinesterase inhibitors in the treatment of dementia.

F Inglis1.   

Abstract

Cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) are dosed in two phases for the treatment of dementia, an initial dose-escalation phase to achieve a therapeutic dose and a maintenance phase where the therapeutic dose is given for long-term therapy. ChEIs are associated with a range of side effects as a result of cholinergic stimulation in different areas of the brain and the periphery Acute, centrally-mediated gastrointestinal events (mostly nausea and vomiting) are class effects of all ChEIs, and are reported mostly during the dose-escalation phase of therapy. These events have been associated more with the dual acetylcholinesterase/butyrylcholinesterase (AChE/BuChE) inhibitor rivastigmine than with the AChE-selective inhibitors donepezil and galantamine, probably due to rivastigmine's higher potency. However, these events can be minimised using slow dose escalation with small dose graduations and administration with food. Other side effects associated with ChEIs include central nervous system events, extrapyramidal symptoms, sleep disturbances and cardiorespiratory events, associated with cholinergic activity in the cortex, caudate nucleus, brainstem and medulla, respectively, and muscle cramps and weakness, cardiorespiratory events and urinary incontinence, associated with peripheral cholinergic activity. These symptoms are mostly reported during the maintenance phase of therapy. They are more frequently reported with donepezil, but are rarely reported with rivastigmine, and galantamine may not have been marketed long enough to make an adequate assessment. These differences are due to the drugs' respective pharmacology. For example, donepezil and rivastigmine are active centrally, in contrast to galantamine, which is more active peripherally. Furthermore, rivastigmine preferentially inhibits the G1 isoform of cholinesterase, predominantly located in the cortex, hippocampus and in neuritic plaques, while donepezil and galantamine are not selective for any cholinesterase isoforms and have wide cholinergic activity both centrally and peripherally The cholinergic activity of rivastigmine, in contrast to donepezil and galantamine, is apparently more targeted at clinically relevant brain sites. The pharmacological profile of rivastigmine results in it having a low potential to interact with other drugs and it may be used with a high margin of safety in patients having a wide variety of concomitant diseases. Donepezil and galantamine may have significant interactions with other drugs that are metabolised by the hepatic cytochrome system and therefore need to be used with caution in patients with many concomitant illnesses. When dosed with care, ChEIs are well tolerated and patient compliance and patient and caregiver acceptability are good. The favourable tolerability and safety profiles of these agents make them suitable first-line therapy for dementia. In addition, patients who have tolerability and/or safety problems in maintenance treatment that limit the use of donepezil or galantamine may benefit from switching to rivastigmine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12139367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pract Suppl        ISSN: 1368-504X


  55 in total

1.  Role of P-glycoprotein in mediating rivastigmine effect on amyloid-β brain load and related pathology in Alzheimer's disease mouse model.

Authors:  Loqman A Mohamed; Jeffrey N Keller; Amal Kaddoumi
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2016-01-15

Review 2.  Rivastigmine from capsules to patch: therapeutic advances in the management of Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease dementia.

Authors:  Carl H Sadowsky; Joseph L Micca; George T Grossberg; Drew M Velting
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2014-09-04

3.  Melaena following Use of the Cholinesterase Inhibitor Rivastigmine.

Authors:  Pietro Gareri; Luca Gallelli; Guido Ferreri Ibbadu; Roberto Lacava; Emilio Russo; Giovambattista De Sarro
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 4.  Is long-term treatment of Alzheimer's disease with cholinesterase inhibitor therapy justified?

Authors:  Ben Seltzer
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  Quinine-responsive muscle cramps in X-linked bulbospinal muscular atrophy Kennedy.

Authors:  J Finsterer; C Stöllberger
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2009-03-22       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Peripheral cholinoceptor antagonist anisodamine counteracts cholinergic adverse effects and facilitates cognitive amelioration of rivastigmine.

Authors:  Wei-Wei Zhang; Zu-Peng Xu; Yong-Yao Cui; Hao Wang; Ming-Ke Song; Juan Li; Bi-Yun Shao; Zheng Xia; Hong-Zhuan Chen
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 7.  Transdermal rivastigmine: management of cutaneous adverse events and review of the literature.

Authors:  Jill Greenspoon; Nathan Herrmann; David N Adam
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 8.  A Risk-Benefit Assessment of Dementia Medications: Systematic Review of the Evidence.

Authors:  Jacob S Buckley; Shelley R Salpeter
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  Once-daily transdermal rivastigmine in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Andreas Wentrup; Wolfgang H Oertel; Richard Dodel
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 4.162

10.  Comparison of persistence rates of acetylcholine-esterase inhibitors in a state Medicaid program.

Authors:  Susan M Abughosh; Stephen J Kogut
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.