BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although pancreatic trauma, isolated or not, is uncommon, it carries significant morbidity and mortality because of the delay in recognition and consequent treatment. METHODS: The current knowledge of pancreatic injury, concerning the incidence, mechanism of induction, diagnosis, treatment, complications and outcome, is herein presented based on a literature review and our limited experience. RESULTS: The diagnosis of pancreatic trauma entails a high index of suspicion because neither clinical nor laboratory evaluation provide pathognomonic elements. Patients with penetrating injuries are usually evaluated during laparotomy, while those with a blunt trauma can be managed conservatively, provided they are in a stable condition, there is no pancreatic duct involvement and care is intensive. At laparotomy, minor pancreatic injuries are best managed by drainage. Distal pancreatectomy is best suited for distal pancreatic trauma with ductal involvement. For severe trauma, Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy, pancreaticogastrostomy, duodenal diversion operations and Whipple's procedure are all indicated according to the preoperative evaluation and intraoperative findings. Independent of the procedure to be performed, drainage is mandatory. CONCLUSION: Because pancreatic injury is rare, most general surgeons lack experience and ability to deal with such injured patients. Therefore, an experienced and skilled surgeon should govern the management of pancreatic trauma in order to minimize the incidence of morbidity and mortality. Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel and IAP
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although pancreatic trauma, isolated or not, is uncommon, it carries significant morbidity and mortality because of the delay in recognition and consequent treatment. METHODS: The current knowledge of pancreatic injury, concerning the incidence, mechanism of induction, diagnosis, treatment, complications and outcome, is herein presented based on a literature review and our limited experience. RESULTS: The diagnosis of pancreatic trauma entails a high index of suspicion because neither clinical nor laboratory evaluation provide pathognomonic elements. Patients with penetrating injuries are usually evaluated during laparotomy, while those with a blunt trauma can be managed conservatively, provided they are in a stable condition, there is no pancreatic duct involvement and care is intensive. At laparotomy, minor pancreatic injuries are best managed by drainage. Distal pancreatectomy is best suited for distal pancreatic trauma with ductal involvement. For severe trauma, Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy, pancreaticogastrostomy, duodenal diversion operations and Whipple's procedure are all indicated according to the preoperative evaluation and intraoperative findings. Independent of the procedure to be performed, drainage is mandatory. CONCLUSION: Because pancreatic injury is rare, most general surgeons lack experience and ability to deal with such injured patients. Therefore, an experienced and skilled surgeon should govern the management of pancreatic trauma in order to minimize the incidence of morbidity and mortality. Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel and IAP