Literature DB >> 12137833

Comparison of WHO/ISUP and WHO classification of noninvasive papillary urothelial neoplasms for risk of progression.

Hemamali Samaratunga1, Danil V Makarov, Jonathan I Epstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relation of the World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology (WHO/ISUP) system for bladder neoplasia to prognosis.
METHODS: A total of 134 patients with pTa bladder tumors were identified. We excluded cases with prior or concurrent carcinoma in situ or invasion (pT1 or pT2). Progression was defined as a tumor recurrence with either lamina propria (pT1) or muscularis propria (pT2) invasion or carcinoma in situ. Age at diagnosis, sex, tumor size, multifocality, and grade (WHO, WHO/ISUP) were entered into a Cox multivariate analysis to predict progression.
RESULTS: The distribution of WHO papilloma, WHO G1, WHO G2, and WHO G3 was 5.2%, 31.3%, 59%, and 4.5%, respectively. The distribution of WHO/ISUP papilloma, tumors of low malignant potential, low-grade carcinomas, and high-grade carcinomas was 2.2%, 21.6%, 13%, and 21.6%, respectively. The mean and median follow-up was 56.2 and 50 months, respectively. The 90-month actuarial risk of progression for WHO papilloma, G1, G2, and G3 was 0%, 11%, 24%, and 60%, respectively. The corresponding progression rate for WHO/ISUP papilloma, tumors of low malignant potential, low-grade carcinoma, and high-grade carcinoma was 0%, 8%, 13%, and 51%, respectively. In separate analyses, WHO grade (P = 0.003) and tumor size (P = 0.03), as well as WHO/ISUP (P = 0.002) and tumor size (P = 0.04), independently predicted progression.
CONCLUSIONS: WHO G3 has a more rapid progression rate and a slightly worse long-term progression rate compared with WHO/ISUP high-grade carcinoma. However, although only 4.5% of tumors were WHO G3, we were able to classify 21.6% as WHO/ISUP high-grade carcinoma with a poor prognosis. Use of the WHO/ISUP system allows urologists to more closely follow a larger group of patients at high risk of progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12137833     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01705-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  18 in total

Review 1.  Classification and grading of the non-invasive urothelial neoplasms: recent advances and controversies.

Authors:  R Montironi; A Lopez-Beltran; R Mazzucchelli; D G Bostwick
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Karyometry detects subvisual differences in chromatin organisation state between non-recurrent and recurrent papillary urothelial neoplasms of low malignant potential.

Authors:  M Scarpelli; R Montironi; L M Tarquini; P W Hamilton; A López Beltran; J Ranger-Moore; P H Bartels
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Expression of claudins and their prognostic significance in noninvasive urothelial neoplasms of the human urinary bladder.

Authors:  Eszter Székely; Péter Törzsök; Péter Riesz; Anna Korompay; Attila Fintha; Tamás Székely; Gábor Lotz; Péter Nyirády; Imre Romics; József Tímár; Zsuzsa Schaff; András Kiss
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 2.479

4.  Histologic grading of urothelial papillary neoplasms: impact of combined grading (two-numbered grading system) on reproducibility.

Authors:  Burçin Tuna; Kutsal Yörükoglu; Ender Düzcan; Sait Sen; Nalan Nese; Banu Sarsık; Aysegul Akder; Sehnaz Sayhan; Uğur Mungan; Ziya Kirkali
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 5.  [Urinary bladder tumours. The new 2004 WHO classification].

Authors:  M Seitz; D Zaak; R Knüchel-Clarke; C Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Clinicopathological characteristics of urothelial bladder cancer in patients less than 40 years old.

Authors:  Eva Compérat; Stéphane Larré; Morgan Roupret; Yann Neuzillet; Géraldine Pignot; Hervé Quintens; Nadine Houéde; Catherine Roy; Xavier Durand; Justine Varinot; Dimitri Vordos; Mathieu Rouanne; Mohammed Adnan Bakhri; Priscilla Bertrand; Stephane Calin Jeglinschi; Olivier Cussenot; Michel Soulié; Christian Pfister
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Bladder papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential in Chinese: a clinical and pathological analysis.

Authors:  Xin-Ke Zhang; Ying-Ying Wang; Jie-Wei Chen; Tao Qin
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-05-01

8.  Urinary bladder cancer in yemen.

Authors:  Abdullah Saleh Al-Samawi; Saleh Mansoor Aulaqi
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2013-09

Review 9.  Reproducibility and reliability of tumor grading in urological neoplasms.

Authors:  Rainer Engers
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Histological classification and stage of newly diagnosed bladder cancer in a population-based study from the Northeastern United States.

Authors:  Alan R Schned; Angeline S Andrew; Carmen J Marsit; Karl T Kelsey; Michael S Zens; Margaret R Karagas
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.