Literature DB >> 12137821

Power Doppler ultrasonography-directed prostate biopsy in men with elevated serum PSA levels: an evaluation of the clinical utility and limitations.

Satoru Takahashi1, Yukio Yamada, Yukio Homma, Shigeo Horie, Yoshio Hosaka, Tadaichi Kitamura.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the utility and limitations of power Doppler ultrasonography (PDU)-directed prostate biopsy in patients with elevated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels.
METHODS: A total of 108 men (mean age 67.7 years, range 50 to 86) with serum PSA levels of greater than 4.0 ng/mL were assessed using digital rectal examination (DRE), gray-scale transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS), and PDU. Prostate vasculature identified on PDU was judged using a grading system. Subsequently, these patients underwent systematic six-core transperineal biopsy and additional biopsies for positive sites on DRE, gray-scale TRUS, and PDU.
RESULTS: A hypervascular site and prostate cancer on PDU was identified in 43 (40%) and 40 (37%) cases, respectively. PDU-directed and systematic six-core biopsies could independently detect 36 and 30 cancer cases, respectively. The sensitivity of PDU for cancer detection was 90%, specificity 90%, positive predictive value 84%, negative predictive value 94%, and accuracy 90%. High test performance was also observed in 53 cases with serum PSA levels of 4.1 to 10 ng/mL (sensitivity 77%, specificity 88%, positive predictive value 67%, negative predictive value 92%, and accuracy 85%). These values were superior or comparable to those of DRE and gray-scale TRUS. Inflammatory reactions and prostatic calculi were probable major causes of false-positive and false-negative results on PDU, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: PDU can identify appropriate sites for biopsy and improve the cancer detection rate. However, PDU-directed biopsy does not appear to identify prostate cancer with sufficient accuracy to omit the systematic biopsy, and combined use of these methods should be preferable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12137821     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01702-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of power Doppler ultrasound with gray scale transrectal ultrasound in predicting cancer positive prostate biopsy cores.

Authors:  Turgay Kahraman; Rahmi Cubuk; Orhun Sinanoglu; Nuri Tasalı; Mumtaz Ozarar; Bulent Saydam
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2010-08

2.  Doppler spectral waveform parameters at neurovascular bundle vessels in patients with prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Yuh-Shyan Tsai; Yeong-Chin Jou; Chia-Hong Chen; Chien-Chen Chang; Wen-Horng Yang; Jan-Li Lai; Tzong-Shin Tzai
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 2.942

3.  Novel contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Martijn Smeenge; Massimo Mischi; M Pilar Laguna Pes; Jean J M C H de la Rosette; Hessel Wijkstra
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 4.226

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.