Literature DB >> 12137612

Surgical versus conservative treatment for acute injuries of the lateral ligament complex of the ankle in adults.

G M M J Kerkhoffs1, H H G Handoll, R de Bie, B H Rowe, P A A Struijs.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inversion injuries, primarily sprains, of the ankle are one of the most commonly treated injuries. The three main treatment modalities for acute lateral ankle ligament injuries are immobilisation with plaster cast or splint, 'functional treatment' comprising early mobilisation and the use of an external support (e.g. ankle brace or taping), and surgical repair or reconstruction.
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare surgical versus conservative treatment for acute injuries of the lateral ligament complex of the ankle in adults. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Injuries Group specialised register (December 2001), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2001), MEDLINE (1966 to May 2000), EMBASE (1980 to May 2000), CURRENT CONTENTS (1993 to 1999), BIOSIS (to 1999), reference lists of articles, and contacted organisations and researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing surgical with conservative interventions for treating acute injuries to the lateral ligament complex of the ankle in adults. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least two, usually three, reviewers independently assessed methodological quality and extracted data. Where appropriate, results of comparable studies were pooled using fixed and random effects models and relative risks with 95% confidence intervals for dichotomous outcomes calculated. Heterogeneity between trials was tested using a standard chi-squared test. We undertook sensitivity analyses to explore the effects of inclusion of quasi-randomised trials and subgroup analyses by the two main methods of conservative treatment. MAIN
RESULTS: Seventeen studies, involving a total of 1950 mostly young active adult males, were included. All trials had methodological flaws. In particular, allocation was rated as effectively concealed in only one trial and there was no report of masking outcome assessors to the interventions in any trial. Outcome measures were variously defined and data for pooling for individual outcomes were only available for a maximum of 11 studies. While there were statistically significant differences for three primary outcomes (non-return to pre-injury level of sports; undefined pain or pain on activity; and subjective or functional instability) in favour of the surgical treatment group using the fixed effects model, these findings failed to demonstrate robustness in sensitivity analyses. Exclusion of the data from explicitly quasi-randomised trials or, given the highly statistically significant heterogeneity, analyses using the random effects model modified these findings to non-statistically significant differences. There was no statistically significant difference in ankle sprain recurrence, the other primary outcome measure. Though there was a statistically significantly higher incidence of objective instability in conservatively treated patients, the functional implications of this are uncertain. There was some evidence for a lower incidence of long-term ankle swelling in surgically treated patients. However, as well as tending to take longer to resume normal activities, including work, there was some limited evidence from a few trials for a higher incidence of ankle stiffness, impaired ankle mobility and complications in the surgical treatment group. Subgroup analyses by type of conservative treatment (plaster cast or functional treatment) revealed no statistically significant differences in effect for any of the six outcomes examined. REVIEWER'S
CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence available from randomised controlled trials to determine the relative effectiveness of surgical and conservative treatment for acute injuries of the lateral ligament complex of the ankle. Sufficiently powered, good quality and adequately reported randomised trials of primary surgical repair versus the best available conservative treatment for well-defined injuries are required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12137612     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  14 in total

Review 1.  [Lateral ligament injuries].

Authors:  H Waizy; N Harrasser; K Fehske
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  The role of MRI in musculoskeletal practice: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Gail Dean Deyle
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-08

Review 3.  Effectiveness of additional supervised exercises compared with conventional treatment alone in patients with acute lateral ankle sprains: systematic review.

Authors:  Rogier M van Rijn; John van Ochten; Pim A J Luijsterburg; Marienke van Middelkoop; Bart W Koes; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-10-26

4.  In vivo kinematics of the tibiotalar joint after lateral ankle instability.

Authors:  Adam M Caputo; Jun Y Lee; Chuck E Spritzer; Mark E Easley; James K DeOrio; James A Nunley; Louis E DeFrate
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Structural abnormalities and persistent complaints after an ankle sprain are not associated: an observational case control study in primary care.

Authors:  John M van Ochten; Marinka C E Mos; Nienke van Putte-Katier; Edwin H G Oei; Patrick J E Bindels; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra; Marienke van Middelkoop
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Repair of acute injuries of the lateral ligament complex of the ankle by suture anchors.

Authors:  Xiang-Fei Liu; Yang Fang; Zhong-Hua Cao; Guang-Feng Li; Guo-Qing Yang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

7.  The ANKLE TRIAL (ankle treatment after injuries of the ankle ligaments): what is the benefit of external support devices in the functional treatment of acute ankle sprain? A randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Suzanne Witjes; Femke Gresnigt; Michel P J van den Bekerom; Jan G Olsman; Niek C van Dijk
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Diagnosis and treatment of acute ankle injuries: development of an evidence-based algorithm.

Authors:  Hans Polzer; Karl Georg Kanz; Wolf Christian Prall; Florian Haasters; Ben Ockert; Wolf Mutschler; Stefan Grote
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2011-12-14

9.  Outcome and patients' satisfaction after functional treatment of acute lateral ankle injuries at emergency departments versus family doctor offices.

Authors:  Patrik R Schwab; Lorin M Benneker; Stefan Eggli; Heinz Zimmermann; Aristomenis K Exadaktylos
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 2.497

10.  Analgesic effect of perineural local anesthetics, steroids, and conventional medical management for trauma and compression-related peripheral neuropathic pain: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Anuj Bhatia; Vera Bril; Richard T Brull; Anthony V Perruccio; Duminda N Wijeysundera; Johnny Lau; Rajiv Gandhi; Nizar Mahomed; Aileen M Davis
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2021-07-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.