Literature DB >> 12137136

Children's use of landmarks: implications for modularity theory.

Amy E Learmonth1, Lynn Nadel, Nora S Newcombe.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that disoriented children use the geometric features of the environment to reorient, but the results have not consistently demonstrated whether children can combine such information with landmark information. Results indicating that they cannot suggest the existence of a geometric module for reorientation. However results indicating that children can use geometric information in combination with landmark information challenge the modularity interpretation. An uncontrolled variable in the studies yielding conflicting results has been the size of the experimental space. In the present studies, which tested young children in spaces of two different sizes, the size of the space affected their ability to use available landmark information. In the small space, the children did not use the landmark to reorient, but in the large space they did. The ability of children to use landmarks in combination with geometric information raises important questions about the existence of an encapsulated geometric module.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12137136     DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2002.00461.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  52 in total

1.  Spatial reorientation by geometry with freestanding objects and extended surfaces: a unifying view.

Authors:  Tommaso Pecchia; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  From maps to navigation: the role of cues in finding locations in a virtual environment.

Authors:  Adam T Hutcheson; Douglas H Wedell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-08

3.  Geometric and featural systems, separable and combined: Evidence from reorientation in people with Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Katrina Ferrara; Barbara Landau
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-08-10

Review 4.  Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Squaring theory and evidence.

Authors:  Ken Cheng; Nora S Newcombe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-02

5.  Spatial encoding in mountain chickadees: features overshadow geometry.

Authors:  Emily R Gray; Laurie L Bloomfield; Anne Ferrey; Marcia L Spetch; Christopher B Sturdy
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  The reach-to-grasp-food task for rats: a rare case of modularity in animal behavior?

Authors:  Linda Hermer-Vazquez; Raymond Hermer-Vazquez; John K Chapin
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Spatial language influences memory for spatial scenes.

Authors:  Michele I Feist; Dedre Gentner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-03

8.  Spatial decisions and cognitive strategies of monkeys and humans based on abstract spatial stimuli in rotation test.

Authors:  Tereza Nekovarova; Jan Nedvidek; Daniel Klement; Jan Bures
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Assessing human reorientation ability inside virtual reality environments: the effects of retention interval and landmark characteristics.

Authors:  Andrea Bosco; Luciana Picucci; Alessandro O Caffò; Giulio E Lancioni; Valérie Gyselinck
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2008-03-20

10.  Bonobos, chimpanzees, gorillas, and orang utans use feature and spatial cues in two spatial memory tasks.

Authors:  Patricia Kanngiesser; Josep Call
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 3.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.