Literature DB >> 12137131

Illusory causation: why it occurs.

G Daniel Lassiter1, Andrew L Geers, Patrick J Munhall, Robert J Ploutz-Snyder, David L Breitenbecher.   

Abstract

Considerable evidence indicates that people overattribute causality to a given stimulus when it is salient or the focus of their attention--the so-called illusory-causation phenomenon. Although illusory causation has proved to be quite robust and generalizable, a compelling explanation for it has not been empirically documented. Four social-attribution studies were conducted to test the hypothesis that illusory causation occurs because salient information is initially registered, or perceptually organized, differently than nonsalient information. The results provide considerable support for the notion that people's literal point of view affects how they initially perceive, or extract, information from an observed interaction, which in turn affects their judgments regarding the causal influence exerted by each interactant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12137131     DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2002..x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  8 in total

1.  Learning about what others were doing: verb aspect and attributions of mundane and criminal intent for past actions.

Authors:  William Hart; Dolores Albarracín
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-12-30

2.  Selfish play increases during high-stakes NBA games and is rewarded with more lucrative contracts.

Authors:  Eric Luis Uhlmann; Christopher M Barnes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  The DSM: mindful science or mindless power? A critical review.

Authors:  Bassam Khoury; Ellen J Langer; Francesco Pagnini
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-17

4.  Body camera footage leads to lower judgments of intent than dash camera footage.

Authors:  Broderick L Turner; Eugene M Caruso; Mike A Dilich; Neal J Roese
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Judging One's Own or Another Person's Responsibility in Interactions With Automation.

Authors:  Nir Douer; Joachim Meyer
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 2.888

6.  Innocent until primed: mock jurors' racially biased response to the presumption of innocence.

Authors:  Danielle M Young; Justin D Levinson; Scott Sinnett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Causal illusions in the classroom: how the distribution of student outcomes can promote false instructional beliefs.

Authors:  Kit S Double; Julie Y L Chow; Evan J Livesey; Therese N Hopfenbeck
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2020-08-03

8.  Priming the self as an agent influences causal, spatial, and temporal events: implications for animacy, cultural differences, and clinical settings.

Authors:  John L Dennis; Davide Margola
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-04-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.