Literature DB >> 12136815

The child's right to consent to x-ray and imaging investigations: issues of restraint and immobilization from a multidisciplinary perspective.

Maryann Hardy1, Gerry Armitage.   

Abstract

Children's rights in healthcare are determined by law but strongly influenced by Piagetian theory and the related personal attitudes of healthcare professionals. While a greater priority has been given to children's rights through the United Nations Convention and in the United Kingdom by means of particular legislation, this does not necessarily translate into child-centred practice. The restraint and immobilization of children are significant issues for health professionals who care for children. This paper argues that professional guidance and healthcare law are ambiguous in this regard, failing to offer direct, objective guidance to the personnel involved. A further degree of complexity is added, if when considering the child's wishes, they differ from those of their parents. It is recommended that an effective resolution of these issues and their consequences demands that healthcare professionals familiarize themselves with the legal and ethical implications of restraining or immobilizing children, and develop a systematic approach to this aspect of practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12136815     DOI: 10.1177/136749350200600204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Child Health Care        ISSN: 1367-4935            Impact factor:   1.979


  1 in total

1.  A simple tool to measure procedural restraint intensity in children: validation of the PRIC (Procedural Restraint Intensity in Children) scale.

Authors:  Bénédicte Lombart; Daniel Annequin; Patricia Cimerman; Carla De Stefano; Odile Perrin; Celine Bouchart; Marie-Claire Schommer; Laura Ramelot; Céline Petit; Elisabeth Fournier-Charriere; Anne Caron; Solène Trebosc; Barbara Tourniaire; Michel Galinski
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-08-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.