Literature DB >> 12135375

Evidence for a novel, strongly bound acto-S1 complex carrying ADP and phosphate stabilized in the G680V mutant of Dictyostelium myosin II.

Taro Q P Uyeda1, Kiyotaka Tokuraku, Kuniyoshi Kaseda, Martin R Webb, Bruce Patterson.   

Abstract

Gly 680 of Dictyostelium myosin II sits at a critical position within the reactive thiol helices. We have previously shown that G680V mutant subfragment 1 largely remains in strongly actin-bound states in the presence of ATP. We speculated that acto-G680V subfragment 1 complexes accumulate in the A.M.ADP.P(i) state on the basis of the biochemical phenotypes conferred by mutations which suppress the G680V mutation in vivo [Wu, Y., et al. (1999) Genetics 153, 107-116]. Here, we report further characterization of the interaction between actin and G680V subfragment 1. Light scattering data demonstrate that the majority of G680V subfragment 1 is bound to actin in the presence of ATP. These acto-G680V subfragment 1 complexes in the presence of ATP do not efficiently quench the fluorescence of pyrene-actin, unlike those in rigor complexes or in the presence of ADP alone. Kinetic analyses demonstrated that phosphate release, but not ATP hydrolysis or ADP release, is very slow and rate limiting in the acto-G680V subfragment 1 ATPase cycle. Single turnover kinetic analysis demonstrates that, during ATP hydrolysis by the acto-G680V subfragment 1 complex, quenching of pyrene fluorescence significantly lags the increase of light scattering. This is unlike the situation with wild-type subfragment 1, where the two signals have similar rate constants. These data support the hypothesis that the main intermediate during ATP hydrolysis by acto-G680V subfragment 1 is an acto-subfragment 1 complex carrying ADP and P(i), which scatters light but does not quench the pyrene fluorescence and so has a different conformation from the rigor complex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12135375     DOI: 10.1021/bi026177i

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  9 in total

1.  Amino acids 519-524 of Dictyostelium myosin II form a surface loop that aids actin binding by facilitating a conformational change.

Authors:  Taro Q P Uyeda; Bruce Patterson; Leonardo Mendoza; Yuichi Hiratsuka
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.698

2.  G146V mutation at the hinge region of actin reveals a myosin class-specific requirement of actin conformations for motility.

Authors:  Taro Q P Noguchi; Tomotaka Komori; Nobuhisa Umeki; Noriyuki Demizu; Kohji Ito; Atsuko Hikikoshi Iwane; Kiyotaka Tokuraku; Toshio Yanagida; Taro Q P Uyeda
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Phosphorylation of a single head of smooth muscle myosin activates the whole molecule.

Authors:  Arthur S Rovner; Patricia M Fagnant; Kathleen M Trybus
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Mutation of a conserved glycine in the SH1-SH2 helix affects the load-dependent kinetics of myosin.

Authors:  Neil M Kad; Joseph B Patlak; Patricia M Fagnant; Kathleen M Trybus; David M Warshaw
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Predicting allosteric communication in myosin via a pathway of conserved residues.

Authors:  Susan Tang; Jung-Chi Liao; Alexander R Dunn; Russ B Altman; James A Spudich; Jeanette P Schmidt
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Structural and mechanistic insights into the function of the unconventional class XIV myosin MyoA from Toxoplasma gondii.

Authors:  Cameron J Powell; Raghavendran Ramaswamy; Anne Kelsen; David J Hamelin; David M Warshaw; Jürgen Bosch; John E Burke; Gary E Ward; Martin J Boulanger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Structural basis for the allosteric interference of myosin function by reactive thiol region mutations G680A and G680V.

Authors:  Matthias Preller; Stefanie Bauer; Nancy Adamek; Setsuko Fujita-Becker; Roman Fedorov; Michael A Geeves; Dietmar J Manstein
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-08-13       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Allosteric regulation by cooperative conformational changes of actin filaments drives mutually exclusive binding with cofilin and myosin.

Authors:  Kien Xuan Ngo; Nobuhisa Umeki; Saku T Kijima; Noriyuki Kodera; Hiroaki Ueno; Nozomi Furutani-Umezu; Jun Nakajima; Taro Q P Noguchi; Akira Nagasaki; Kiyotaka Tokuraku; Taro Q P Uyeda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Acceleration of the sliding movement of actin filaments with the use of a non-motile mutant myosin in in vitro motility assays driven by skeletal muscle heavy meromyosin.

Authors:  Kohei Iwase; Masateru Tanaka; Keiko Hirose; Taro Q P Uyeda; Hajime Honda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.